Search Results for "Section 364"

713 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 713 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 364-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand for ransom and identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Raju @ Rakesh Dhaniram Patel, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik for offences punishable under Section 364-A (kidna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Kidnapping and Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Including Last Seen Evidence and Recovery of Articles Proved Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 364, 302, 201, 386 IPC.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment of the III Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, convicting the appellants for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case — Life Imprisonment Upheld. Evidence of Demand for Ransom and Recovery of Victim at Accused's Instance Establishes Offence Under Section 364(A) IPC.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by three appellants convicted under Sections 363 and 364(A) read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Circumstantial Evidence Case Due to Unreliable Last Seen Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302/364/392/394/201 IPC set aside as chain of circumstances was incomplete.

The appellant, Dinesh Kumar, along with co-accused Mange Ram, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jagadhri, Haryana, for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in MCOCA Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Ransom. Conviction under Section 364A IPC and MCOCA set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the victim was kidnapped for ransom.

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Special Judge under MCOC Case No. 15 of 2005 for offences under Section 364A, 365,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction in Murder and Ransom Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Together Theory. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 364-A, 384 IPC confirmed as chain of circumstances complete and consistent with guilt.

The appellant, Kushal @ Akash Dattatray Prabhu, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Nashik for the murder of Mohitesh Pralin Baviskar and for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in NDPS Case Based on Confessional Statements and Recovery of Charas. Statements under Section 67 of NDPS Act, 1985 held admissible and voluntary, and recovery of contraband from house and auto rickshaw established guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The Supreme Court of India heard two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had affirmed the conviction of S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Hostile Witness Testimony. Section 106 of Evidence Act Applied to Shift Burden on Accused to Explain Injuries in Shared Household.

The appeal arises from a conviction under Section 302 IPC for the murder of the appellant's wife, Saira. The marriage was in 1982, and they had a daug...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Under Section 364-A IPC — Life Sentence Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Identification of Victim and Accused.

The case involves three appeals filed by Mohammad Imdar Ali (A-4), Srinivas Gauramkondu (A-2), and Suraj Kumar Jha (A-3) against their conviction and ...