Search Results for "Section 32(1) Indian Evidence Act"

253 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 253 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in IPC Forgery Case Due to Material Suppression and Witness Intimidation -- Appellant's Appeal Against High Court's Bail Order Upheld as Accused Concealed Multiple FIRs and Abused Liberty

The Supreme Court heard a criminal appeal against the High Court's order granting bail to Respondent No. 2 in an FIR involving offences under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Hostile Witnesses. Acquittal of Accused Under Section 302 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 31.01...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Delayed Notice Beyond 30 Days Under Section 138 NI Act. Notice Posted on 31st Day from Bank Intimation Fails to Meet Mandatory Requirement of 'Giving Notice' Within 30 Days.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Shivnath Suryoba Gaonkar, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010026042017_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Claim for Short Delivery of Urea Due to Lack of Title to Sue Under Bill of Lading. Plaintiff Not a Party to Bill of Lading and Cannot Maintain Admiralty Action for Short Landing.

The plaintiff, Dreymoor Fertilizers Overseas Pte. Ltd., filed an admiralty suit against the vessel m.v. Theoforos-1 claiming short delivery of 520.30 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Official Liquidators' Appeal in Company Winding-Up Rent Claim Dispute. Landlord's Claim for Rent Priority Denied as Proviso to Rule 97 of Company Rules Does Not Grant Precedence Over Other Creditors.

The dispute arose out of the winding up of U. P. Union Bank Ltd. The bank was a tenant in a building owned by the respondent landlord. After the windi...