Search Results for "Section 281"

374 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 374 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Bail Order in Murder Conviction Appeal Due to Lack of Exceptional Circumstances. High Court Erred in Granting Suspension of Sentence Under Section 389 CrPC Without Considering Serious Nature of Offence Under Section 302 IPC and Trial Court Findings.

The dispute arose from a criminal appeal filed by the informant, challenging the High Court's order that suspended the life sentence and granted bail ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Restoring Arbitral Award Set Aside by Single Judge. Limited Judicial Review Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Precludes Re-appreciation of Evidence Unless Award Shocks Conscience or Conflicts with Public Policy.

The dispute arose between Appellant, a foreign company manufacturing biscuits in Zimbabwe, and Respondent, an Indian partnership firm, regarding the s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Demolition Order in Municipal Corporation Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Section 212(2) Notice Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 Set Aside as Show-Cause Notice Did Not Specify Time for Compliance.

The case involves a group of writ petitions filed by owners of lands and structures within the limits of Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation. The p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Petition Seeking to Offer Maintenance After Final Order Under Section 125(1) CrPC. Second Proviso to Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Apply in Execution Proceedings After Maintenance Order Has Become Final.

The petitioner, Shivaji Tukaram Davargave, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the orders of the Magistrate and th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit by 'VOGUE' Magazine Owner Against 'JUST IN VOGUE' Retail Services. Well-Known Mark 'VOGUE' Protected Against Use for Dissimilar Services Under Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiffs, Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. and its subsidiary, are the proprietors and users of the trademark 'VOGUE' in respect of magazines a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Rental Income Classification Case. Rental income from leasing unsold units of a commercial complex constructed by a real estate developer is assessable as business income, not income from house property.

The case involves multiple appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which ...