Search Results for "Rehabilitation grant"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Rehabilitation grant"

870 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 870 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition Notifications Under Section 24 of 2013 Act — Possession Taken and Compensation Paid Under 1894 Act Precludes Lapse. Acquisition of land for a cooperative housing society upheld as possession was taken and compensation paid before the 2013 Act came into force.

24 Jun 2015

The petitioners, owners of land measuring 2 acres in Sy.No.7 and 1 acre in Sy.No.9 of Gubbalala village, Bangalore South Taluk, challenged the acquisi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Reclassification of Mill Land as Non-NAINA Area Under DCPR 2034. Court upholds Monitoring Committee's decision that land not required for textile industry reverts to municipal reservation for public housing and amenity purposes.

22 Mar 2024

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Glider Buildcon Realtors Pvt Ltd and Mafatlal Industries Ltd challenging the decision of the Monitor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Condition No. 5 of NOCs for Redevelopment Projects — Condition Imposing Payment of Expenditure Incurred by Board Held Unauthorized and Without Legal Basis. Court directs refund of amounts paid under protest pursuant to the impugned condition.

23 Nov 2022

The Petitioner, Chandulal Jorawarmal Mehta, a sole proprietor of Mehta Developers, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.

20 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Disability Certificate Issued by Medical Board in BEST Employee Case. The Court held that the employer cannot challenge the disability certificate without independent evidence, and the writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 is not maintainable.

12 Aug 2020

The petitioner, Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Civil Appeal on the Scope of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Overriding the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 in a Pre-Existing Asset Sale Agreement. The AAIFR Ruled That Section 22A Does Not Apply to Pre-Existing Agreements, and the Supreme Court Was to Determine the Correctness.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard a civil appeal arising from orders passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (AAIFR) conce...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

26 Nov 2015

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Subsequent Purchaser in Land Acquisition Case — Purchase After Section 4 Notification Confers No Right to Challenge Acquisition or Invoke Section 24 of 2013 Act.

14 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court considered whether a purchaser of land after issuance of a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can invoke...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order Under Section 33 of Displaced Persons Compensation and Rehabilitation Act, 1954 — Evacuee Property Claim Rejected Due to Lack of Evidence of Ownership and Possession. The court held that the burden of proof lies on the claimant to establish ownership and possession of property notified as evacuee property under Section 7 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1947.

11 May 2012

The petitioners, Shaikh Mohammad Murghay and Smt. Sheela Ravindra Lakhanpal, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Passing of Award Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 11A of 1894 Act.

9 Jan 2018

The matter involved a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India filed by landowners whose agricultural lands in Mahajenaha...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)