Search Results for "RSA Section 100"

235 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 235 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Suit Based on Adverse Possession — High Court's Reversal in Second Appeal Without Substantial Question of Law Set Aside. Concurrent Findings of Possession and Ouster by Trial Court and First Appellate Court Restored.

The dispute pertains to a property measuring 1 acre and 18¼ guntas in Sy. No.1/4 originally owned by Thimmadasappa. He executed a registered sale dee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Restores Trial Court Decree of Permanent Injunction. The Court held that the First Appellate Court's failure to frame points for determination under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC vitiated its judgment.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (plaintiffs) and the respondents (defendants) concerning a suit for permanent injunction. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

The appellant, Sri Shivashankar, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Substantial Question of Law Not Arising as Courts Below Correctly Appreciated Evidence and Applied Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Sri Masood Ahamed Baig, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when both lower courts have concurrently found that the plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession.

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs in the original suit, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The original plaintiff, B. Jayamma, filed a suit for partition of suit schedule property claiming to be the wife of late Bheemaiah and daughter of lat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Second Appeal and Remands Suit for Recovery of Possession for Fresh Adjudication; First Appellate Court's Decree Set Aside for Failure to Frame Points for Determination and Properly Prove Wills under Evidence Act.

The case arose from a regular second appeal filed by the legal representatives of the original defendant against the judgment of the first appellate c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Restored. Agreement of Sale Proved by Attesting Witness and Part Performance Established; First Appellate Court's Reversal Held Perverse.

The appellants, legal representatives of the original plaintiff, filed a second appeal under Section 100 CPC against the judgment and decree of the IV...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Title Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Plaintiff's title based on Hakkupatra grant upheld by both courts below; no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Smt. Sumitra Bai, was the defendant in a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction filed by the respondent-plaintiff, P. S...