Search Results for "Preventive Detention Act"

919 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 919 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Reproduction of Grounds. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Violated as Relevant Documents Not Supplied.

The petitioner, Jitendra @ Tiger Umaji Pawar, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Boot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay and Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider vital documents and exhibited casual approach.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Siraz Mohammed Sayyed, challenged a detention order dated 10 July 2015 passed under Sections 3(1)(ii) and 3(1)(i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Failure to Consider Detenu's Custody Status. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority did not record satisfaction that detenu was likely to be released on bail.

The petitioner, Mujammil @ Murgya Sabbir Mokashi, challenged an order of detention dated 26.09.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune City un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Communication of Representation to Advisory Board. Failure to Forward Detenu's Representation to Advisory Board Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 10 of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Rupesh Ram Thakur, challenged an order of detention dated 17 October 2017 passed under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dang...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Status of Detenu.

The petitioner, Suryakant @ Mukesh Laxman Dhotre, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Dru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Right to Representation and Mechanical Confirmation. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Section 8 of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985 Was Not Communicated, Rendering Detention Illegal.

The writ petition was filed by Smt. Prathiba Talapati, wife of the detenu Sri. Dawood Nadaf, challenging the preventive detention order dated 03.06.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Measures. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Did Not Consider Whether Bail Conditions Could Adequately Prevent Petitioner's Dangerous Activities.

The petitioner, Deepak Suryawanshi, challenged a preventive detention order dated 11 July 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Secti...