Search Results for "Order XXXVII"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Order XXXVII"

165 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 165 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Suit for Recovery of $300,000 in Commercial Contract Dispute. Zee Entertainment's claim for payment under a content licensing agreement upheld against Triller Inc for failure to make payment despite repeated demands.

7 Sep 2023

The plaintiff, Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited, a public listed company, filed a summary suit in the Commercial Division of the Bombay High Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Decree in Summary Suit — Negligence of Counsel Constitutes Sufficient Cause Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC. The court set aside the ex parte decree and granted leave to defend subject to deposit of decretal amount.

13 Jun 2017

The present civil revision application challenges the order dated 26.04.2016 passed by the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur in Summary C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition Notices Issued by Nagpur Improvement Trust for Alleged Unauthorized Construction. Court holds that show cause notices under Section 53 of the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 must be served on the owner or person in possession, and that the Trust cannot demolish without giving an opportunity of hearing.

19 Mar 2012

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by owners of flats in Nagpur challenging demolition notices issued by the Nagpur Improvement Trust (N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds HUF Claim Over Share Income in Partnership Firm — Unilateral Declaration Valid When Supported by HUF Funds and Consistent Assessments. Income from 6% share in B. Mehta & Co. held to belong to HUF headed by M.D. Vora, not individual assessee, based on investment of HUF capital and subsequent consistent treatment in HUF assessments.

12 Jul 2005

The case involved a reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the assessee, M. D. Vora. The dispute pertained to ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of States Reorganisation Act, 1956: Formation of Composite Bombay State Without Fresh Reference to State Legislature Upheld. Modification of Bill by Parliament Does Not Require Second Reference Under Proviso to Article 3 of the Constitution of India.

28 Aug 1959

The case arose from a challenge to the constitutional validity of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956. Following the report of the States Reorganisati...

15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)