Search Results for "NDPS Court"

495 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 495 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Release of Seized Vehicle in NDPS Case — Owner Not Accused, No Confiscation Proceedings Initiated. Vehicle Owner Entitled to Interim Custody Under Section 457 Cr.P.C. Pending Trial, Subject to Conditions Including Bank Guarantee of Rs. 1,00,000.

The petitioner, Kawal Jeet Kaur, is the registered owner of a vehicle (a truck) that was seized by the Excise Range Office, Indi, in Crime No. 105/202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Owner in NDPS Case for Lack of Knowledge of Contraband Transport. Section 25 NDPS Act Requires Proof That Owner Knowingly Permitted Use of Vehicle for Drug Offence.

The appellant, Harbhajan Singh, was convicted under Section 25 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) by the Trial Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case: Reversal of Acquittal by High Court Sustained. Commercial Quantity of Charas Recovered from Appellants; Complainant as Investigating Officer Not Per Se Biased.

The case pertains to the conviction of Rajesh Dhiman and Gulshan Rana under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (ND...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50. Search of Accused Without Informing Them of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Recovery Illegal.

The case involves four appeals filed by Abdul Rehman @ Haji Ali, Bandu @ Bunty Dagdu Udanshive, Mohammed Afzal @ Afzal Chouda Hayat Qureshi, and Zakir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions. Conviction under Section 20(ii)(c) of NDPS Act, 1985 set aside as prosecution failed to comply with Sections 42 and 50 of the Act.

The appellants were convicted by the trial court under Section 20(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, for possession o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Failure to Record Reasons for Belief and Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Mohd. Akram Mohd. Majij Shaikh, was convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) by the Special ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Iranian Nationals in Customs Narcotics Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Conscious Possession. Conviction under NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove that accused had knowledge of heroin concealed in suitcases.

The case involves two Iranian nationals, Mohamound Mehri Allahyari (original accused No.2) and Rajabali Nejad Dehghan (original accused No.1), who wer...