Search Results for "NDPS Act, 1985"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "NDPS Act, 1985"

389 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 389 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case on Ground of Long Incarceration — Commercial Quantity of MDMA Seized, Trial Not Likely to Conclude Soon. The court held that prolonged incarceration without trial can be a ground for bail even in cases involving commercial quantity under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, 1985, relying on Rabi Prakash v. State of Odisha.

30 Jun 2026

The applicant, Akil Ahmed Ansari, filed a bail application under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) in connection wit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Bail to Pregnant Woman in NDPS Case on Humanitarian Grounds Despite Commercial Quantity Recovery. Court allows temporary bail for six months to an advanced-stage pregnant accused, relying on Supreme Court guidelines in R.D. Upadhya v. State of A.P. regarding childbirth in prison.

27 Nov 2024

The applicant, Surbhi d/o Raju Soni, was arrested on 30 April 2024 in connection with Crime No.92/2024 registered at Gondia Railway Police Station for...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Release of Seized Vehicle in NDPS Case — Owner Not Accused, No Confiscation Proceedings Initiated. Vehicle Owner Entitled to Interim Custody Under Section 457 Cr.P.C. Pending Trial, Subject to Conditions Including Bank Guarantee of Rs. 1,00,000.

5 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Kawal Jeet Kaur, is the registered owner of a vehicle (a truck) that was seized by the Excise Range Office, Indi, in Crime No. 105/202...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Accused No.2 in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions of Sections 41, 42, and 50 of NDPS Act. Search and Seizure Conducted by Police Officer Not Empowered Under Section 41(2) and Without Following Section 50 Procedure Renders Proceedings Invalid.

7 Dec 2022

The petitioner, Sri Rangappa, accused No.2 in C.C. No.340/2021 (old C.C. No.234/2020) pending before the Principal Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.) and CJM Court...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case: Reversal of Acquittal by High Court Sustained. Commercial Quantity of Charas Recovered from Appellants; Complainant as Investigating Officer Not Per Se Biased.

11 Dec 2020

The case pertains to the conviction of Rajesh Dhiman and Gulshan Rana under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (ND...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Insufficient Evidence — Confession of Co-Accused and Retracted Confession Without Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction for Financing Illicit Traffic Under Section 27A NDPS Act

4 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Mohammed Fasrin, who was convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under NDPS Act for Charas Possession — Informant as Investigating Officer Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial. The Court held that Section 50 NDPS Act does not apply to search of bags, and the informant being the investigating officer does not per se vitiate the trial if no prejudice is shown and the law was nebulous.

11 Feb 2019

The appellant, Varinder Kumar, was convicted under Section 20(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for posses...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convicted Accused in NDPS Case for Heroin Possession — Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act Upheld. The court held that the appellant failed to discharge the burden of proof under Sections 35 and 54 of the NDPS Act, and the conviction under Section 21(b) r/w 8(c) and 29 r/w 8(c) and 21(b) was sustainable.

1 Aug 2013

The appellant, V.S. Anandan, was convicted by the Special Judge under the NDPS Act for offences punishable under Section 21(b) read with Section 8(c) ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions. Conviction under Section 20(ii)(c) of NDPS Act, 1985 set aside as prosecution failed to comply with Sections 42 and 50 of the Act.

22 Jan 2013

The appellants were convicted by the trial court under Section 20(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, for possession o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Iranian Nationals in Customs Narcotics Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Conscious Possession. Conviction under NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove that accused had knowledge of heroin concealed in suitcases.

1 Mar 2006

The case involves two Iranian nationals, Mohamound Mehri Allahyari (original accused No.2) and Rajabali Nejad Dehghan (original accused No.1), who wer...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)