Search Results for "Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948"

196 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 196 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Petitioner in IPC Marital Rape Exception Challenge; Declares Exception 2 to Section 375 IPC Unconstitutional for Girls Aged 15-18. The Court Held That the Exception Violates Articles 14, 15(3) and 21 of the Constitution by Discriminating Between Married and Unmarried Girls and Disregarding Child Marriage Prohibition.

1 Aug 2026

The writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed by Independent Thought, a child rights society, challenging Exception 2 to Section 37...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Heirs' Petition in Tenancy Dispute Due to Delay and Laches. False Statement Regarding Knowledge of Proceedings Leads to Dismissal Under Article 227 of Constitution of India.

12 Apr 2024

The petition was filed by the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased original tenant, Baban Vishnu Shivale, under Article 227 of the Constitu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Ownership in Favor of Daughter. Claim of adverse possession by brother against sister fails as co-owner must prove ouster or denial of title.

19 Jan 2024

The dispute pertains to agricultural lands and a house situated at Village Dhokawade, Taluka Alibaug, District Raigad, originally owned by Narayan Hir...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code — Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Are Only for Fiscal Purposes. The court held that writ petitions against mutation entries are not maintainable when alternative remedy under Section 247 of MLRC is available.

5 Dec 2023

The judgment involves three writ petitions challenging mutation entries in revenue records. The petitioners in WP 9745/2011, WP 2755/2023, and WP 289/...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Revenue Authorities in Stamp Duty Undervaluation Cases — Revisional Powers Under Section 47A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Upheld. The Court held that the limitation period for suo motu revision by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority is five years from the date of the order, not from the date of registration.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from orders of the Madras High Court concerning the interpretation of Section 47A of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Suo-Moto Revision by Commissioner in Tenancy Matter Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction. The Additional Commissioner's order setting aside Tahsildar's decision after 9 years was held to be without jurisdiction and barred by limitation under Section 32-G of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

13 Jan 2011

The petitioners, who were landlords of land admeasuring 4H 27½ Guntha in Survey No. 77 at village Chinchoti, challenged the order of the Additional C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Tenancy Purchase Price Dispute — MRT Order Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind. The court restored the Assistant Collector's order directing the Tahsildar to fix purchase price under Section 32-G of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, holding that the MRT failed to consider evidence and reasoning.

5 Oct 2006

The petitioner, Ramchandra B. Posugade, a tenant, filed an application under Section 32-G read with Section 70-B of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultura...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlords' Petition Challenging Remand Order by Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in Tenancy Dispute. Finality Clause under Section 73 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Does Not Bar Revision Jurisdiction of Tribunal When Possession Issue Remains Unresolved.

14 Sep 2005

The petitioners, landlords, were aggrieved by an order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated 31 July 1991 in Revision Application No. MRT.P....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal Order in Tenancy Dispute. Exemption Certificate Under Section 88-B of Bombay Tenancy Act Set Aside as Suit Land Not Trust Property on 1.4.1957.

26 Apr 2005

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 10.8.1998 passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Tenancy Purchase Dispute — Section 32-F(1A) of Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Not Applicable as Landlord Attained Majority Before Its Introduction. Tenant's Intimation of Purchase Sent After Landlord Attained Majority Held Invalid, Landlord Entitled to Terminate Tenancy.

12 Jan 2005

The petitioner, a landlord, challenged the order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal dated 14th September 1990, which had allowed the tenant's revisio...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)