Search Results for "MRTU and PULP Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "MRTU and PULP Act"

532 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 532 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Interim Relief in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Restraint on Termination Without Due Process and Seven Days' Notice for Transfer Upheld. Industrial Court's Order Under MRTU & PULP Act Found Not Perverse or Jurisdictionally Erroneous.

30 Jan 2024

The petitioners, The Indian Express (P) Ltd. and others, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 19 September 2022 passed by the Industrial C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practice. Circular Raising Retirement Age from 58 to 60 Years for Seasonal Employees Held Applicable to Respondent Employee Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

7 May 2019

The petitioner, Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Kapus Utpadak Panan Mahasangh Maryadit, Jalgaon Zone, challenged the judgment and order dated 31/08/2001 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Rejection of Interim Relief in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint — Closure of Factory by Employer Held Not Prima Facie Illegal Despite Assurance to Employees. The Court held that the Industrial Court misapplied the tests for interim relief under Section 30(2) of the MRTU & PULP Act, as closure is a right of the employer and the assurance regarding a different unit did not make the closure illegal.

9 Aug 2018

The Petitioner, Viraj Engineering Company, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing engineering components, decided to close its factory on 9 March...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Cooperative Housing Society Against Unfair Labour Practice Complaint — Society Not an Industry Under Industrial Disputes Act. Letting out of community hall is a mere adjunct, not predominant activity, hence complaint under MRTU & PULP Act not maintainable.

9 Aug 2018

The case involves a writ petition filed by The Saraswat Suburban C.H.S. Limited and others (petitioners) against Naresh Shyamlal Velendra (respondent)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in MRTU & PULP Act Case — Industrial Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Directing Employer to Pay for Workmen's Defence Advocate. No Statutory Obligation on Employer to Bear Cost of Advocate for Workmen in Domestic Enquiry Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

7 Oct 2016

The petitioners, M/s. Esdee Paints Ltd. and its directors, challenged an order dated 16.08.2016 passed by the Learned Member of the Industrial Court, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Maharashtra State Financial Corporation Challenging Reinstatement of Employee Acquitted in Criminal Case. Dismissal Based on Conviction for Moral Turpitude Set Aside as Acquittal Subsequent to Dismissal Vitiates the Basis of Termination Under Regulation 39 of the Bombay State Financial Corporation (Staff) Regulations, 1954.

1 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Financial Corporation, dismissed its employee, Respondent No.1, under Regulation 39 of the Bombay State Financial Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order — Employee Entitled to CRTE Under Kalelkar Settlement. Unfair Labour Practice Established Under MRTU & PULP Act for Failure to Convert NMR Employee to Regular Establishment After Five Years.

1 Feb 2010

The case involves a writ petition filed by the State of Maharashtra challenging an order of the Industrial Court dated 04.08.2008 in Complaint (ULP) N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Labour Court's Reinstatement Order Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction. The Labour Court exceeded its jurisdiction under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 by ordering reinstatement without back wages when the domestic inquiry was fair and punishment not disproportionate.

20 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Bombay Dyeing and Mfg. Co. Ltd., challenged the orders of the Labour Court dated 5.3.2005 and 3.10.2005, which directed reinstatement ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition in Wage Dispute — Unfair Labour Practice Upheld. Continuous Cause of Action Justifies Delay Condonation Under MRTU & PULP Act for Non-Payment of Wages as Per Wage Board Scale.

3 Oct 2005

The petitioner, Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited, a sugar factory, employed the respondent, Mohan Ambadas Mule, as a compounder on 18th Ju...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Company Seeking Dismissal of Complaint Filed by Employees Who Accepted Voluntary Retirement Scheme. Employees who accepted VRS benefits with a declaration waiving all claims cannot continue with a pending complaint under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

12 Jul 2005

The petitioner, M/s. Burroughs Wellcome (I) Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Industrial Court which dismissed its application ...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)