Search Results for "MPDA Act, 1981"

248 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 248 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Supply of Documents. Failure to Furnish Copies of Relied-Upon Documents to Detenu Violates Article 22(5) and Section 8 of MPDA Act, Rendering Detention Order Invalid.

The petitioner, Rohit Uddhav Kadlaskar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court (Circuit Ben...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Communication of Grounds. Failure to Supply Copies of Documents Relied Upon Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Rohit Uddhav Kadlaskar, challenged a detention order dated 10.11.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Solapur under the Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Detention Under MPDA Act — In-Camera Statements Verified by Authorized Officer Sufficient. Detention order under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act upheld as statements of confidential witnesses were verified by Assistant Commissioner of Police and found genuine.

The petitioner, Rohit @ Karan s/o Purshottam Naukariya, was detained by an order dated 22/12/2021 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur City (r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority mechanically recited grounds without considering detenu's custody status.

The petitioner, Rohit Sidram Khatal, challenged an order of detention dated 17/3/2020 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur under Section 3 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Status of Detenu.

The petitioner, Suryakant @ Mukesh Laxman Dhotre, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Dru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind to Bail Conditions. Detenu Granted Bail in One Case and Remanded in Another, Yet Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Likelihood of Release and Continued Dangerous Activity.

The petitioner, Mohammed Asif @ Mental Abdul Sattar Shaikh @ Mohd. Asif @ Mental Abdul Sattar Khan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 15.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay. Unexplained Delay of Over Two Months Between In-Camera Statements and Detention Order Breaks Live Link, Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 7th July 2005 passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activit...