Search Results for "Karnataka High Court Arbitration Rules"

184 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 184 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Disposes of Arbitration Appeal as Settled Through Mediation — Parties Enter Settlement Agreement, Appeal Disposed in Terms of Settlement. The court held that the settlement agreement shall form part of the judgment and decree, and the appellant is entitled to refund of court fee.

The case involves a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed by M/s.BMM ISPAT Limited against M/s. Unicon Engineers under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Recall of Witness and Additional Documents in Commercial Suit — Upholds Liberal Approach Under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC. Party Seeking to Place on Record E-Mails and Recall PW-1 for Cross-Examination Must Be Permitted to Ensure Fair Trial and Effective Adjudication.

The dispute arose from a Professional Services Agreement dated 19th February 2013 between M/s. Levitate Mobile Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (LMT), the appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Direct Designation as Senior Advocate — Power Vests Exclusively in Full Court Under Indira Jaising Guidelines. Petitioner's Claim for Direct Conferment of Senior Advocate Designation Rejected as Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, a lawyer enrolled with the Bar Council of Chhattisgarh since 2013, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Bar Council of Mah...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Termination by District Central Cooperative Bank, Holding It Not a State Under Article 12. Cooperative Bank Employee's Challenge to Dismissal Fails as DCC Bank Is Not an Instrumentality of the State and No Violation of Natural Justice Established.

The petitioner, Kiran Rangnath Kale, was employed as a Manager at the Beed District Central Cooperative Bank (respondent No. 3). He was initially appo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Varun Global Limited for Non-Payment of Loan Debt. Life Insurance Corporation of India Succeeds in Proving Company's Inability to Pay Debts Under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order Under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Rejecting Settlement Application for Non-Disclosure of Full Income.

The petitioner, Major Metals Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30 December 2010 passed by t...