Search Results for "High Court Gujarat"

6600 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6600 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Civil Court in Possession Dispute Involving Family Members. Section 33 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Held Not to Bar Suit as Tenancy Question Not Directly Arising.

The appeal before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from an order of a learned Single Judge deciding a preliminary issue of jurisdicti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal on Maintainability of Writ Petition Against Bar Association. Court Examines Whether Bar Association is Amenable to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 in Dispute Over Co-Option of President.

The appeal arose from the dismissal of a writ petition by a Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka on the ground of maintainability. The writ pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Act for Alleged Smuggling of Red Sanders. Questions Raised Over Violation of Right to Equal Representation and Proper Subjective Satisfaction.

The petition was filed by the wife of the detenu Ajit Bapu Satam, challenging his preventive detention under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010422252008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employee's Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Reversal of Reinstatement Order. Industrial Court Erred in Permitting De Novo Enquiry Without Employer Reserving Right in Written Statement as Per Supreme Court Precedent.

This writ petition arises from an industrial dispute where the petitioner-employee, a sweeper with the Nanded-Waghala City Municipal Corporation, chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Commercial Summary Suit Cases — Triable Issues Raised on Guarantee and Limitation. Court holds that existence of disputed facts regarding limitation and discharge of guarantor requires unconditional leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC.

The judgment arises from two commercial appeals filed by the defendants against the dismissal of their applications for leave to defend in commercial ...