Search Results for "Customs Confiscation"

229 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 229 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Cases Involving 100% EOU — Cenvat Credit on Inputs and Capital Goods Allowed Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial compliance with Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Notification No. 22/2003-CE sufficient for entitlement to Cenvat credit.

The judgment concerns three Central Excise Appeals filed by Shri Dharampal Lalchand Chug and Shri Kamal Lalchand Chug, who are sole proprietors of 100...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Properties under SAFEMA. Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Validly Triggers SAFEMA Proceedings Despite Non-Execution of Detention and Redemption of Confiscated Currency.

The petitioner, Smt. Yamini S. Bhagwanji, challenged the forfeiture of three immovable properties and certain bank accounts under the Smugglers and Fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Order Reducing Redemption Fine and Penalty Without Reasons. Tribunal's reliance on non-binding precedent from another bench held improper as it ignored its own earlier order.

The Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai, filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the order of the Customs, Excise and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes One-Year Renewal of Stage Carriage Permits Under Section 58 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. Renewal Period Must Conform to Original Permit Period, Minimum Three Years.

The case originated from the expiry of stage carriage permits held by the petitioners on March 31, 1958. They applied for renewal before the Regional ...