Search Results for "Court Auction Sale"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Court Auction Sale"

975 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 975 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Bank's Illegal Dispossession of Auction Purchaser. Petitioner Purchased Flat in 2017 Auction by SBI, but Was Forcibly Evicted by Saraswat Bank in 2025 Without Due Process.

30 Jun 2026

The petitioners, Mariyam Rangwala and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court at Bo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Possession of Auctioned Property — Bank Not Obligated to Deliver Vacant Possession Under SARFAESI Act. SARFAESI Act, 2002 Section 13(4) and Section 17 — Auction Sale Confirmed in Favor of Petitioner, but Bank Delivered Only Symbolic Possession; Petitioner's Remedy Lies Before DRT Under Section 17.

16 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Mr. Suresh Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Issues Rule and Hears Matter Finally in Writ Petition Challenging MSEDCL Communication. The Court Decides the Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution with Consent of Parties After Respondents Waive Service.

6 Jun 2025

The petitioners, a private limited company and its shareholder, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Exclusion of Third Party Lands from Auction Sale in Company Liquidation — Official Liquidator Cannot Sell Properties Not Owned by Company. Applicants Established Title Through Patta and Chitta, Entitled to Exclusion Without Setting Aside Auction.

29 Jan 2025

The case involves multiple company applications filed by S. Mahendran and K. Singili (applicants) against the Official Liquidator and the Administrato...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Guarantor's Challenge to Sale Certificate and DRT Order Due to Inordinate Delay. Petitioner, a guarantor, challenged the sale of secured assets under SARFAESI Act after nine years, but the court held the petition barred by laches and upheld the DRT's dismissal of the application under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.

22 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Sri Anil H. Lad, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at B...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Appellants' Application Under Order 21 Rules 97, 98, 101 CPC Rejected by Executing Court Set Aside. Court Holds That Executing Court Must Determine Rights of Third Parties Claiming Independent Possession Under Order 21 Rule 101 CPC Before Confirming Sale.

19 Sep 2022

The present appeal was filed by the appellants, who were the legal heirs of the original judgment-debtor, Hiranappa (since deceased), and other family...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Auction Dispute — No Criminal Offence Made Out in Absence of Fraud or Dishonest Intention. Sale Certificate Issued by Corporation Under Section 29 of SFC Act Confers Title; Subsequent Criminal Complaint for Cheating and Trespass Not Maintainable.

17 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Sri Nagaraj Rao C.H., filed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of the order dated 30.07.2016 passed by the I ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Bank Officers in SARFAESI Act Loan Recovery Dispute. Civil Nature of Transaction Precludes Criminal Prosecution Under Sections 406, 409, 420 IPC.

6 Mar 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by K. Virupaksha and another, who were Deputy General Managers of Canara Bank, against the order of the Kar...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Execution Petition — Limitation for Appeal Under Section 100 CPC Not Applicable to Orders Under Order 21 Rule 32 CPC. First Appellate Court Directed to Consider Condonation of Delay Application on Merits Before Dismissing Appeal as Time-Barred.

17 Jul 2013

This second appeal was filed by the decree-holder in HRC 4/78 against the rejection of his execution petition in Exn.P.162/90 and the judgment of the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Declares Rule 6(3)(d) of Karnataka Urban Development Authority Rules 1991 as Ultra Vires and Unconstitutional — Refund of Auction Deposit Ordered with Interest. Rule 6(3)(d) allowing forfeiture of deposit without proof of loss was held to be in conflict with Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and thus ultra vires the Constitution.

2 Jan 2013

The petitioners, Shri K Babjan and K Sulaiman, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging Rule 6(3)(d) o...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)