Search Results for "Central Sales Tax Act, 1956"

451 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 451 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Sales Tax Exemption Dispute Under Karnataka Industrial Policy. Industrial Policy 1996-2001 Does Not Cover Purchase Tax Under Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by M/s High Range Coffee Curing Pvt. Ltd. against the State of Karnataka and others, challenging the High Court's ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Official Liquidator's Plea for Handover of Assets and Records of Companies in Liquidation. Law Enforcement Agencies' Seizure of Properties and Books of Account Examined in Context of Winding Up Proceedings Under Companies Act, 1956.

The proceedings involved multiple Official Liquidator’s Reports and a Company Application arising out of the winding up of M/s. City Limouzines (Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Orders Rejecting Condonation of Delay in Customs and Central Excise Appeals; Directs Fresh Consideration. Appellate Authorities Failed to Exclude Time Taken in Prosecuting Writ Petitions Before Filing Statutory Appeals, as Required Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. The lead petition, WP N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Income Tax Order for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 269UN of Income Tax Act, 1961. Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred as Appropriate Authority's Order Under Chapter XXC Is Final and Conclusive.

The plaintiff, Sasmita Investments Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay High Court challenging an order passed by the Appropriate Authority under Chapter ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restricts Provisional Attachment to Disputed Amount in MVAT Act Case — Section 48(5) Constitutional Challenge Rejected. Court holds that attachment under Section 35 must be proportionate, and directs respondents to limit attachment to Rs.1.81 crores.

The petitioner, M/s. Premium Paper and Board Industries Ltd., a registered dealer under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act) and the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

2748

...