Search Results for "Cause of action"

397 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 397 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Against Foreign Sovereign and Union of India for Want of Consent Under Section 86 CPC and Being Time-Barred. Suit Against Sovereign Head of Netherlands Dismissed as Plaint Did Not Disclose Cause of Action and Was Barred by Limitation.

The appellant, K.S. Dhondy, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court for recovery of US $25 million with interest against two respondents: Her Majesty th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Revoke Leave Granted Under Clause XII of Letters Patent Act, 1866 in Commercial Suit for Loan Recovery. Execution of Assignment Deed in Mumbai Constitutes Part of Cause of Action, Sufficient to Maintain Suit.

The Plaintiff, PIL Industries Limited, a company registered in Mumbai, filed a suit against Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd. (Defendant No.1) and others...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction in Hotel Agreement Termination Dispute. Court holds that no part of cause of action arose within its territorial jurisdiction under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Rockwood Hotels & Resorts Limited, a company with its registered office in Mumbai, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Revoke Leave Under Clause XII Letters Patent in Summary Suit on Guarantee. Jurisdiction upheld as part of cause of action arose in Mumbai due to disbursement and part payments.

The appeal arose from a summary suit filed by Rabo India Finance Limited (Plaintiff) against Gouri Prasad Goenka (Defendant) based on guarantees execu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint in Partition Suit for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action and Bar by Limitation. Daughter-in-law's suit for partition of ancestral property dismissed as she is not a coparcener and claim is time-barred under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) CPC.

The plaintiff, Smt. Jayashree Ashok Goregaonkar, filed a suit for partition against the defendants, including Kanta Chandrakant Mhatre and others. The...