Search Results for "Buldana District Order"

196 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 196 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction for Murder Under Sections 302, 201 r/w 34 IPC, Focusing on Deficiencies in Circumstantial Evidence and Procedural Lapses

The appeal arose from a conviction for murder and destruction of evidence under Sections 302 and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 18...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Plaintiff failed to prove title and encroachment over 2 gunthas of land; courts below held that defendant had acquired title by adverse possession.

The plaintiff, Kisanlal Maniklal Rathi, filed a suit for possession of 2 gunthas of land from survey no. 75/4-A at Nandura, claiming ownership through...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Instructor for Suppression of Criminal Case. Employer's Discharge Order Set Aside as Non-Disclosure of Pending Criminal Case Does Not Automatically Justify Termination Without Considering Nature and Gravity of Offence.

The petitioner, Pradeep Manikrao Chikte, was appointed as an Instructor in the Industrial Training Institute at Mehkar on a temporary basis on 4 Janua...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish essential ingredients.

The case involves two appeals against the judgment of the Special Court, Khamgaon, convicting the appellants under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative with material contradictions and lack of corroboration.

The appellants, Gulab, Sunil, Kamal, Amol, and Durgabai, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Buldana in Sessions Case No.65/2017. Gulab a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Rash Driving Causing Death — Evidence of Eye-Witnesses and Spot Panchnama Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 279, 337, 338, 304A IPC.

The applicant, Harish Narayan Burkule, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Khamgaon for offences punishable under Sections 279, 337,...