Search Results for "voidable title"

190 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 190 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Suit for Non-Prosecution. Appeal under Section 96 CPC dismissed as appellants failed to appear and no grounds were made out to interfere with the trial court's judgment.

The present First Appeal was filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging a judgment and decree passed by the trial court....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Adoption Petition, Sets Aside Custody Order in Favor of Adoptive Parents — Deed of Adoption Valid Under Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 Despite Lack of Witnesses and Registration.

The case involves a dispute between adoptive parents (petitioners) and biological parents (respondents) over the custody of a minor child aged 2 years...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Senior Citizen Tribunal Order Against Daughter-in-Law Under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 — Daughter-in-Law Not a 'Relative' Under Section 2(d) of the Act, Tribunal Lacks Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Ranjana Rajkumar Makharia, is the daughter-in-law of respondent No.1, Mayadevi Subhkaran Makharia. The respondents are the petitioner'...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Suit — Plaint Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata as Earlier Suit Was Withdrawn Without Liberty to File Fresh Suit.

The applicant, original defendant No.1 in S.C.S. No.5055/2012, filed a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Complainant failed to establish that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt or liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Pradeep Kashiram Kadam, was the original complainant in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (N.I. Act...