Search Results for "vendor purchaser contract"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "vendor purchaser contract"

305 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 305 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Rescission Application in Execution Proceedings for Specific Performance Decree. Legal representatives of judgment debtor failed to demonstrate grounds for rescission of agreement of sale under Order 21 Rule 35 of CPC, 1908.

20 Jul 2026

The petitioners, legal representatives of late Daulatrao Nitnaware, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25.11.2025 passed by the learned ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Title Dispute Against Government — Holds That Government Cannot Unilaterally Resume Land Without Following Due Process and Payment of Compensation. Court Restores Trial Court Decree Declaring Appellants' Title Based on Valid Sale Deed and Pattadar Passbook, Setting Aside High Court's Reversal.

24 Mar 2025

The case involves a dispute over 3.34 acres of land in Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. The appellants claimed title through a chain of transactions ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Development Authority in Land Allotment Case, Upholding High Court's Directions for Sale Deed Execution and Refund. The Court found no error in the High Court's judgment under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, based on allotment letters, possession handover, and lease-cum-sale agreements creating enforceable rights.

28 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court disposed of a bunch of appeals challenging a common judgment of the High Court that decided five Regular Second Appeals. The appeals...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Settlement Dispute — Upholds Validity of Pre-Emptive Right Clause. Clause requiring written concurrence of all co-sharers before sale to third party is valid and binding; High Court erred in holding it vague and void.

20 Aug 2019

The dispute arose from a family settlement dated 31.03.1982 among three brothers, including the appellant Tilak Raj Bakshi (plaintiff), the first defe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Arbitration Petitions Challenging Award on Family Settlement MOU — Upholds Arbitrator's Findings on Interpretation of MOU Clauses but Sets Aside Award on Certain Claims as Beyond Scope of Reference.

6 May 2015

The judgment arises from two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a sole arbitrator's awa...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Sale Agreement — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. The court held that the plaintiff did not adduce evidence to show continuous readiness and willingness to perform the contract, and the suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

24 Mar 2015

The appellant, V.P. Venkatesh, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Sale Agreement — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. The court held that the plaintiff did not adduce sufficient evidence to show continuous readiness and willingness to perform the contract, and the suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

24 Mar 2015

The appellant, V.P. Venkatesh, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness and Suit Barred by Limitation. Agreement of Sale Dated 12.1.2000 Fixed Three Months for Execution; Suit Filed in 2003 Beyond Limitation Under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

24 Mar 2015

The appellant, V.P. Venkatesh, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Service Matter — Appellant Institution Succeeds in Proving Lack of Employer-Employee Relationship. The respondent failed to establish his employment with the appellant, leading to dismissal of the suit for declaration and injunction.

1 Mar 2013

The appellant, The Chairman The State Government Employees Shikshana Sangha, Laxmi Complex, Neeligin Road, Hubli, represented by its Principal, filed ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Sets Aside Concurrent Findings Due to Non-Joinder of Necessary Party and Improper Appreciation of Evidence. The court held that the suit for partition and separate possession was not maintainable without impleading the legal representatives of a deceased co-sharer, and that the appellate court failed to properly re-appreciate the evidence as required under Section 100 CPC.

4 Feb 2013

The appellant, Mohd. Munner, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)