Search Results for "unsatisfactory explanation"

344 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 344 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Perfunctory Section 313 Examination. Promise of Marriage Not Proven as False from Inception; Relationship Consensual and Delayed FIR Raises Doubts.

The appellant, Maheshwar Tigga, was convicted under Sections 376, 323, and 341 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the Additional Judicial Commissioner,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Testimony of Prosecutrix Lacks Credibility and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Forcible Intercourse.

The appellant, Hiraman Jangu Uike, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 376 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Appellants in Forgery Case for Clerical Error in Vakalatnama. High Court's Direction to Lodge Complaint Set Aside for Lack of Satisfaction Under Section 340 CrPC.

The case arises from a criminal appeal against the judgment of the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dated 14.09.2016, which dismissed the anticipato...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Order and Grants Leave to File Written Statement Subject to Costs — Petitioner's Delay Due to Lack of Proper Advice Considered Sufficient Ground for Indulgence

The Petitioner, Ismail Usman Patel, challenged the order dated 25.04.2018 passed by the learned Trial Judge rejecting his application at Exhibit 11 se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Rental Income Classification Case. Rental income from leasing unsold units of a commercial complex constructed by a real estate developer is assessable as business income, not income from house property.

The case involves multiple appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unreasonable Delay in Considering Representation. Unexplained Delay of 25 Days in Deciding Representation Renders Detention Illegal Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Mr. Rizwan @ Tippu Sattar Pathan, challenged an order of detention dated 5th May 2014 passed under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders in Red Sanders Smuggling Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. Detention under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA set aside as detaining authority did not consider whether bail conditions or other measures would suffice.

The Bombay High Court allowed two habeas corpus petitions challenging preventive detention orders dated 21 February 2013 issued under Section 3(1) of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Three Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Injured Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 307, 326, 427, 148 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case arises from an incident where the complainant, Khawaja Iqbaluddin (PW1), alleged that on 25th September 2003, at around 8:30 p.m., while he w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under M.P.A.D. Act Due to Inordinate Delay in Considering Representation. Detenu's Right to Speedy Consideration of Representation Under Article 22(5) Violated, Detention Order Quashed.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Mohammed Iqbal @ Shembdya Iqbal @ Iqbal Jogeshwari Mohammed Hussain Mandal, filed a writ petition under Article 226...