Search Results for "trademark infringement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "trademark infringement"

193 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 193 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Design Infringement Suit — Registered Design for Mixer Grinder Knob Found Prima Facie Valid and Infringed. Court restrains defendant from manufacturing or selling mixer grinders with a knob that is a substantial reproduction of plaintiff's registered design under Section 22 of Designs Act, 2000.

17 Apr 2026

The plaintiff, Atomberg Technologies Private Limited, filed a suit for damages and injunction against Stove Kraft Limited, alleging infringement of it...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trademark for Non-Use and Discrepancy in User Date — Ayyappan Brand Registration Expunged. The court held that failure to prove use of the mark as registered and unexplained discrepancy in user date warrant removal under Sections 47 and 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

11 Mar 2026

The petitioner, M/s.Sree Lakshmi Balaji Industries, filed a petition under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, seeking removal/rect...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Development Dispute — Upholds Disclosure Directions but Sets Aside Deposit Orders. The court held that while disclosure orders are permissible under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act, a direction to deposit 30% of sale proceeds without a finding of likelihood of dissipation of assets is not sustainable.

17 Dec 2024

The petitioners, Arun Bhoomi Corporation and Vijay Kanhaiyalal Joshi, filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Ex-Parte Ad-Interim Order in Trademark Infringement Suit for Lack of Jurisdiction. Suit filed without cause of action within court's territorial limits held void ab initio under Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

15 Jul 2019

The petitioner, M/s Fine Footwear Private Limited, was the first defendant in a civil suit (O.S. No.2598/2019) filed by the respondents (Skechers enti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Revocation of Patent for Bt Cotton Technology, Remands for Trial on Patent Validity and Infringement Issues. The Court held that patent validity under Section 3(j) of the Patents Act, 1970 cannot be summarily decided without trial and requires expert evidence.

8 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals arising from a suit for permanent injunction filed by Monsanto Technology LLC and others (plaintiffs) again...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Temporary Injunction Granted to Protect Registered Trademark 'Cothas' Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'Cotha'. Prior Registration and Use of 'Cothas' Since 1995 Establishes Prima Facie Case Under Sections 28 and 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

31 Jul 2017

The appellant, M/s. Cothas Coffee Co., a registered partnership firm, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondents, M/s. Cotha Associ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds IPAB Order Expunging Trademark 'Creative' for Deceptive Similarity in Travel Services. Petitioner's mark 'Creative Tours & Travels' held deceptively similar to respondent's registered mark 'Creative Travel', causing confusion among consumers under Section 9(2)(a) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

4 May 2016

The petitioner, Creative Tours & Travels (India) Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Over Pharmaceutical Marks OROFER and OROFER-XT vs COROFER and COROFER-XT. Court finds deceptive similarity and rejects acquiescence defense under Section 33 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

10 Sep 2014

The Plaintiff, Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Corona Remedies Pvt. Ltd., alleging that t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Over 'Neel' Mark — Family Dispute Over Use of Mark Between Partnership Firms. Registered Proprietor of Mark 'Neel' Succeeds in Showing Prima Facie Case of Infringement Under Sections 28 and 29 of Trade Marks Act, 1999, and Passing Off, Despite Family Relationship and Alleged Family Arrangement.

24 Jun 2014

The Plaintiffs, partnership firms and individuals, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the Defendants, alleging unauthoriz...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Trademark Infringement Suit for Lack of Evidence of Use and Passing Off. Marks VIVACITY and VIVZ held not deceptively similar to registered mark VIVA under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

12 Jul 2010

The Plaintiffs, Arviva Industries (India) Ltd., filed a suit seeking an injunction against the Defendants, Vikas M. Tulsian and others, alleging infri...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)