KAHC010224592017_1
6 Jul 2023...
Search Results for "theft charge"
604 result(s) found
Found 604 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Antilia Bomb Scare Case - Offences Bailable Under IPC Sections 120-B and 201. Appellant charged only with criminal conspiracy and destruction of evidence, not under UAPA, entitling him to bail as a matter of right.
23 Dec 2022The appellant, Riyazuddin Hisamuddin Kazi, was arrested in connection with NIA RC 01/2021/NIA/MUM for offences under Sections 120-B and 201 IPC, arisi...
- 45
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds FIRs for Illegal Mining Despite Compounding Under MMDR Act — IPC Offences Are Distinct and Not Barred by Section 22 of MMDR Act. The court held that compounding under the MMDR Act does not bar prosecution under the IPC for theft and criminal misappropriation, as the offences are separate and distinct.
1 Sep 2020The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by private appellants and the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court's refusal to quash FIRs for illegal m...
- 447
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Removal of Employee Convicted of Theft While Under Suspension — Limitation Bar Applied for Delayed Challenge. The Court held that a removal order under Rule 19(i) of CCS (CCA) Rules is not a continuing wrong and delay of 13 years cannot be condoned without sufficient cause.
27 Aug 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which ...
- 216
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Teacher Due to Procedural Lapses in Departmental Enquiry under MEPS Act. Non-payment of subsistence allowance and failure to follow statutory enquiry procedure vitiated the termination, violating principles of natural justice under MEPS Rules, 1981.
20 Mar 2015The matter concerned a challenge by a secondary school teacher to his termination by the management of a private school. The teacher was appointed on ...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Applicants in Kidnapping and Theft Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Mere Presence Without Overt Act or Common Intention Does Not Sustain Charges Under Sections 363, 380, 34 IPC.
23 Jan 2015The applicants, Manikrao Kale, Meher Kale, and Manish Muley, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challengi...
- 92
High Court
Special Court Convicts Broker and Beneficiaries in BMC Bank Securities Fraud; Acquits Employees and Other Brokers. Broker Held Liable for Dishonest Receipt of Stolen Property Under Section 411 IPC, While Beneficiaries Convicted of Cheating Under Section 420 IPC.
18 Jan 2014The case involved a criminal trial before the Special Court under the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 19...
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Section 411 IPC Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge of Stolen Property. Conviction for Dishonest Receipt of Stolen Property Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Mens Rea Under Section 411 IPC.
10 Aug 2012The applicant, Rajesh Ganeshmal Oswal, was accused no.4 in Regular Criminal Case No.110 of 2008 before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Railway C...
- 114
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Lack of Material to Show Alarm or Danger in the Area — Petitioner's Criminal Activities Did Not Justify Externment Under Section 56(1)(a)(b) of Bombay Police Act, 1951
15 Jul 2010The petitioner, Mr. Masiullah Mohid Idrishi, challenged an externment order dated 27.11.2009 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone IV, Mum...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Acquits Accused in NDPS Case for Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Search and Seizure of Charas from Hotel Room Vitiated as Mandatory Procedural Safeguards Not Followed.
13 Dec 2006The appellant, Dhansur Ghartimagar, was convicted by the Special Judge under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Ac...
- 117
