Search Results for "tax penalty interest payment"

879 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 879 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Clarifies Legislative Competence on Alcohol Regulation: Potable vs Industrial Alcohol" "A landmark judgment addressing the scope of State and Union powers on regulating alcohol under the Indian Constitution."

The Supreme Court of India revisited the legislative competence concerning the regulation of alcohol under the Constitution. The court examined whethe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition Challenging Review Orders on MVAT Refund Adjustments Quashed by Bombay High Court. Bombay High Court invalidates review orders under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Taxes Act due to lack of jurisdiction, directing refund of Rs. 2.72 crores with interest.

The Bombay High Court quashed review orders issued under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Taxes Act, 2022 (Settlement Act). The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Penalty Under Excise Rules for Short-lifting of Liquor by CL-9 Licensees. Court Decides in Light of Earlier Decision in Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant, Allowing Petitioners to Raise Further Grounds.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by various CL-9 license holders, including bars and restaurants, challenging the imposition o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case for Notified Person Under Special Court Act. Interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of Income Tax Act, 1961 not chargeable due to assets being vested in Custodian.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which held that the assessee, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 179 Order Against Former Director for Tax Dues of Company — No Evidence of Neglect or Misfeasance. Director Who Resigned Before Relevant Assessment Year Cannot Be Held Liable for Company's Tax Default Under Section 179 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Dinesh T. Tailor, was appointed as an Additional director of Yazad Investment & Finance Private Limited on 2 January 1987. He signed a...