Search Results for "suspicious recovery"

473 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 473 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to PFI Accused in UAPA Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Parity with Co-Accused. Appellant's Custody Since July 2022 Without Charge Framing Violates Article 21.

The appellant, Athar Parwez, was arrested on 12.07.2022 in connection with FIR No. 827/2022 registered at Police Station Phulwari Sharif, Patna, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Murder and Kidnapping of Minor Girl Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Evidence and Recovery of Ornaments Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 302, 363, 201, 404 IPC.

The appellant, Ravindra Anna Domale, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Sessions Case No.190/2014 on 29.04.2016 for off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in NDPS Act Case Upholding Conviction for Ganja Possession. Search Procedure Compliance Upheld as Recovery Was from Baggage, Not Personal Search, Under Section 50 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

The appeal arose from an incident on 11.09.2010 at 10:30 AM when Sub Inspector K.S. Singh (PW-5) apprehended the appellant carrying ganja in a green p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50. Search of Person Without Informing Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Recovery of LSD Papers Illegal.

The appellant, Raymond Locke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mapusa, in Special Case No. 32/2014 for possession of 1.3 grams of LSD p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ravi Somanagouda Patil, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of a person under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life impriso...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeal by Convict Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 394 IPC for Murder and Robbery. The Court Examines the Admissibility of Test Identification Evidence and Recovery of Articles Under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, 1872.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, original accused no. 1, under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand of Dowry and Harassment. Conviction under Sections 302, 304B, 498A, 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove dowry demand and cruelty beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Motiram Marotrao Bhongade, Sanjay Motiram Bhongade, Laxmibai Motiram Bhongade, and Leelabai Falke, were convicted by the 3rd Adhoc Add...