WRIT PETITION NO. 430 OF 2025
9 May 2025...
Search Results for "summoning Magistrate"
400 result(s) found
Found 400 result(s)
High Court
- 12
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against High Court Order Summoning Additional Evidence in Asaram Bapu Conviction Case. Section 391 CrPC Cannot Be Used to Fill Gaps in Prosecution Case or to Introduce Evidence That Could Have Been Produced at Trial.
17 Apr 2023The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Rajasthan against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court dated 10.02.2022. The High Court...
- 228
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Summoning Order Under Section 319 CrPC for Applicant Named in FIR but Excluded from Charge Sheet Based on Alibi Evidence. The court held that the trial court erred in summoning the applicant when the investigating officer had already accepted his alibi and did not file a supplementary charge sheet under Section 173(8) CrPC.
23 Jan 2023The applicant, Anand Shivaji Ghodale, was named in an FIR but not arraigned as an accused in the charge sheet. The investigating officer, after collec...
- 10
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order Summoning Accused Under Section 319 CrPC Due to Insufficient Evidence and Casual Approach. High Court Erred in Setting Aside Trial Court's Rejection of Application Without Adhering to Principles Requiring Strong and Cogent Evidence from Trial Evidence Under Section 319 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
10 Mar 2022The appeal arose from a criminal case involving the murder of Nitin, where the complainant sought to summon the appellant as an accused under Section ...
- 258
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes NBW Against Petitioner in SC/ST Act Case — Substitution of Accused Name Without Proper Investigation Invalid. Court holds that police cannot substitute accused name in charge sheet without further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC.
16 Jul 2015The petitioner, Abdul Kareem, filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of an order dated 24.07.2014 passed by the learned Sessions Jud...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Summons Against Politician in Defamation Case for Alleged Remarks Against RSS — Statements Not Defamatory as They Did Not Refer to Complainant or Any Identifiable Individual.
10 Mar 2015The petitioner, Rahul Gandhi, a Member of Parliament and Vice President of the Indian National Congress, filed a criminal writ petition under Article ...
- 87
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Summons to Chairman of Complainant Society as Defence Witness in Negotiable Instruments Act Case. Chairman Not Examined as Prosecution Witness, Hence No Bar to Summon Him as Defence Witness Under Section 243 CrPC.
27 Jan 2014The petitioner, Kalika Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit, a cooperative society, was the complainant in STC No. 531/2009 pending before the Judicial...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Directing Prosecution to Examine Additional Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC — Power Cannot Be Used to Fill Gaps in Prosecution Case. The court held that summoning uncited witnesses to fill lacunae is beyond the scope of Section 311 CrPC and violates the accused's right to a fair trial.
8 Jul 2010The case involves a criminal application filed by the accused (applicants) challenging an interim order passed by the 1st Ad hoc Additional Sessions J...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Family Members in Dowry Case for Non-Compliance with Section 202 CrPC Amendment. Magistrate failed to hold mandatory enquiry under amended Section 202 CrPC before issuing process against accused residing outside jurisdiction.
7 Jun 2010The petitioners, who are the husband, father, mother, brothers, and sister-in-law of the complainant-wife, challenged the order dated 14.8.2008 passed...
- 51
