Search Results for "sample drawing date"

184 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 184 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Registered Trademark 'SACU-V' for Heart Failure Drug Protected Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'SACV' for Same Composition Pharmaceutical Product.

The Plaintiff, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., is engaged in manufacturing and sale of pharmaceutical preparations. It adopted the trademark 'SACU-V' i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Murder and Kidnapping of Minor Girl Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Evidence and Recovery of Ornaments Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 302, 363, 201, 404 IPC.

The appellant, Ravindra Anna Domale, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Sessions Case No.190/2014 on 29.04.2016 for off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Sentence Modification in Court-Martial Case. General Court Martial Composition Violated Army Rules, 1954, Rule 40(2) and Rule 102, but Armed Forces Tribunal's Sentencing Discretion Under Section 71(e) of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 Upheld.

The dispute arose from disciplinary proceedings against a retired Lieutenant General of the Indian Army, initiated after an anonymous complaint in 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Directions to Media Not to Disclose Rape Victim Identity. Court Holds That Section 228-A IPC and Supreme Court Directions in Nipun Saxena Case Must Be Strictly Followed by Print and Electronic Media.

The petitioner, Sangita Tanpure, the mother of a rape victim, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court seeking directions to th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Uncorroborated Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, M.C. Manjunatha, was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Mysore, in Special Case No. 69/2004 for offences puni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Kidnapping, Rape, and Murder of Minor Girl Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory and Failure to Explain Under Section 106 Evidence Act Confirm Guilt Under Sections 366A, 376(2)(f), 302 IPC.

The appellant, Vijay Babasaheb Nanavare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No. 88 of 2006 for kidnapping a minor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Prosecution Case. Allegation of Pushing Victim from Running Train Fails as Medical Evidence and Witness Testimony Contradict Prosecution Version.

The appellants, Kanchan Deokisanjee Panpalia and Tara Harishkumar Panpalia, were convicted by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Circumstantial Chain. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Manohar Kate, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nilanga, for the murder of his wife Vijayabai (also known as Sujata) unde...