Search Results for "revision against conviction"

1083 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1083 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case but Reduces Compensation Amount. Dishonour of Cheque for Rs. 7,10,000 under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sentence reduced from Rs. 7,10,000 to Rs. 4,70,000.

The petitioner, M/s. Banavathy & Company, filed a criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. against the judgment date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling and Sealing Procedures. Conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 set aside as prosecution failed to prove contraband was same as seized sample.

The petitioner, Sri K K Suresh, was convicted by the Civil Judge & JMFC, Ponnampet in CC No.523/2011 for an offence under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Quashing of Corruption Proceedings Due to Improper Exercise of Inherent Powers. High Court's Order Under Section 482 CrPC Was Unjustified After Dismissal of Discharge Application and Revision Petition on Same Grounds, Violating Principles Against Circumvention and Multiplicity.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Madras quashing criminal proceedings against the respondent under Section 13(2) read with Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Forest Offence Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Karnataka Forest Act and Wildlife Protection Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of forest produce beyond reasonable doubt.

The revision petitioner, Pramod S/o Arjun Kanakupakar, was convicted by the Civil Judge & JMFC, Dandeli in C.C.No.735/2010 for offences under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction of Driver in Rash Driving Death Case. Accused driver convicted under Sections 279 and 304A IPC for causing death of pedestrian due to rash and negligent driving; conviction under Section 134 r/w 187 MV Act also affirmed.

The revision petitioner, Kallappa S/o Bhimappa Sutagannavar, was the accused in a criminal case arising from a road accident on 17.05.2012 at about 2....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction Under Section 304-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove That the Accident Was Caused by the Accused's Rash or Negligent Driving.

The case pertains to a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, K.M. Appachu, challenging his conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Rash Driving and Causing Death by Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC Upheld Based on Consistent Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence.

The petitioner, Domnic Luis, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Margao, for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304-A (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Section 326 IPC Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Medical Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Complainant's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Report Showing Simple Injuries, Not Grievous Hurt as Required Under Section 326 IPC.

The petitioner, Smt. Jijabai Baban Hirnaik, filed a criminal revision application challenging the acquittal of respondents 1 to 4 by the Additional Ch...