Search Results for "recovery doubtful"

987 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 987 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The present appeal was filed by Babu Sakharam Dive, Laxman Raoji Dive, and Tryambak Raoji Dive (original accused nos. 1, 2, and 4) challenging the jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction under Sections 302, 148, 449 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a murder that occurred on 23.09.2013 at about 9.00 p.m. in a village under Kottakuppam Police Station, Villupuram District. The d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Dock Identification and Lack of Corroborative Evidence. Conviction under Section 395 read with Section 397 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was doubtful and recovery of weapon was not linked to crime.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Vinod @ Nasmulla against his conviction under Section 395 read with Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d)(ii) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Pradeep H. Harwalkar, a Junior Passenger Assistant with Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd., was convicted by the Special Court for CBI in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Four Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Conviction under Sections 302, 326, 324 read with Section 34 IPC confirmed as prosecution proved chain of circumstances leading to the murder of the deceased.

The case involves four appellants who were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of one person and causing injuries to othe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Rape of 70-Year-Old Woman with Axe. Evidence of Prosecutrix Found Credible; Minor Contradictions Do Not Discredit Prosecution Case Under Sections 376, 324, 506 IPC.

The appellant, Devidas s/o Ragho Koli, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner, in Sessions Case No. 30 of 2010 for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused in Murder Case Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC Established for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Family Land Dispute.

The case arises from a family land dispute between the Gholap family. The complainant and accused Nos. 1 and 2 are from the same original Gholap famil...