Search Results for "protected workmen"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "protected workmen"

165 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 165 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal in Lease Dispute, Holding Petrol Pump Construction Constitutes Commercial Use Under Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The Court Set Aside the Order Returning the Plaint, Finding that the Dispute Arose from an Agreement Relating to Immovable Property Used Exclusively in Trade or Commerce Under Section 2(1)(c)(vii) of the Act.

17 Mar 2026

The appellants filed a commercial appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Order XLIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Pro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Animal Husbandry Department Against Retired Employees Seeking Pensionary Benefits — Held That Pension Is Not a Bounty but a Right Earned by Service, and Denial Without Proper Justification Is Arbitrary.

9 Dec 2016

The case involves four writ petitions filed by the Commissioner of Animal Husbandry, Maharashtra, and other officers (petitioners) against three retir...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Arbitral Award for Recovery of Money Due Under Agreement. Court Holds That Arbitrator's Findings on Factual Issues and Interpretation of Contract Are Not Open to Interference Under Section 34 Unless Perverse or Contrary to Public Policy.

7 Aug 2015

The appeal arises from a dispute between M/s. Trimurti Exports (appellant) and M/s. Modelama Exports Limited (respondent) concerning a mining concessi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Arbitration Petition and Winding Up Petition Against Corporate Debtor — No Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief or Insolvency as CDR Scheme Was Under Consideration and Debt Was Not Clearly Due.

6 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd., a non-banking financial company, granted a term loan of Rs. 50 crores to the first respondent, U...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163A MV Act — No Fault Liability Principle Precludes Defence of Victim's Negligence. The Court held that the defence of wrongful act or neglect of the victim is not available in proceedings under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as the provision is a complete code based on no fault liability.

6 Feb 2014

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 15th June 2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai in M.A.C.P. No. 2554 of 1995. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Company for Failure to Repay Convertible Bonds — Debt Admitted and Company Unable to Pay Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that where a debt is admitted and the company is commercially insolvent, a winding up order is justified.

30 Jul 2013

The Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch, as trustee for bondholders, filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 ag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Employee in Education Service Dispute — Illegal Termination Violates M.E.P.S. Rules. Employee's discontinuation without inquiry and notice held illegal; employer directed to reinstate with back wages and continuity.

19 Mar 2012

The case involves an appeal by an educational institution and its headmaster against a common judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

29 Jul 2011

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Interim Reinstatement Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Labour Court's Direction to Reinstate Workman with Full Wages Pending Complaint Upheld as Proper Exercise of Power Under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act.

27 Feb 2006

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai dated 25th October 2005, which dismissed its revision...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Disabled Employee Against Private Company for Violation of Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. Employer Directed to Re-Employ or Pay Compensation for Hearing Loss Acquired Due to Unsafe Work Environment.

23 Dec 2005

The petitioner, Shree Satish Prabhakar Padhye, a person with hearing disability, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

14 15 16 17

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)