Search Results for "preventive detention"

740 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 740 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in NDPS Case for Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(e) of PITNDPS Act, 1988 set aside as mere involvement in illicit traffic without affecting public order does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Kazimali @ Wasim Yunusali @ Saiyedsaab Saiyed, filed a petition through his brother-in-law challenging a preventive detention order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Mohammadanawaz @ Salman Mohsmmadyusuf Shekh, through his mother Shekh Kamrunisha Mohammadyusuf, challenged the legality and validity o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act Due to Insufficient Impact on Public Order. Detention Based on Five Criminal Cases Under Section 304(2) BNS Found Inadequate to Establish Prejudice to Public Order Under Section 2(c) of the Act.

The case involved a petition challenging a preventive detention order passed under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985. The det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Detention Order Under PIT-NDPS Act for Non-Application of Mind and Procedural Lapses. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside Due to Failure to Consider Pending Bail Application and Unexplained Delay in Forwarding Representation.

The petitioner, a Nigerian national, was detained under Section 3 of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Failure to Consider Detenu's Custody Status. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority did not record satisfaction that detenu was likely to be released on bail.

The petitioner, Mujammil @ Murgya Sabbir Mokashi, challenged an order of detention dated 26.09.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune City un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Placement of Bail Order Before Detaining Authority. The court held that the bail order was a vital document and its non-consideration vitiated the subjective satisfaction under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, brother of the detinue, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the detention order dated 17th...