Search Results for "penalty under Excise Rules"

422 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 422 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Wagon Supply Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that appellant failed to prove force majeure and that respondent was entitled to refund of advance payment with interest.

The appellant, Titagarh Wagons Limited, entered into a purchase order dated 20.02.2006 with the respondent, Chowgule and Company Private Limited, for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Customs Appeals in Gold Smuggling Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Violations. Confiscation of Gold and Imposition of Penalties Set Aside for Failure to Prove Smuggling Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves five appeals filed by Ciabro Alemao (through legal representatives), Joaquim Alemao, Churchill Alemao, Anthony John Rodrigues, and S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CBEC Circular on Service Tax Refund for Exporters — Circular Held Ultra Vires Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 93 of Finance Act, 1994.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies including Larsen & Toubro Limited, Uhde India Private Limited, Tata Tel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Predeposit Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute. The Court held that the Tribunal must consider prima facie case, balance of convenience, and financial hardship while deciding waiver of predeposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

The appellant, Hyva (India) Private Limited, is engaged in body building on motor vehicle chassis supplied by Tata Motors Limited. Tata Motors clears ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case on Third Member Reference and Remand Ambiguity. The court held that the third member cannot go beyond the referred question and the remand order was ambiguous, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

The case involves an appeal by M/s. Kelkar Trading Corporation and Shri Chintamani Shridhar Kelkar against the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence of 26/11 Terrorist in Mumbai Attacks Case. Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused Due to Insufficient Evidence, Finding No Perversity in Trial Court's Decision.

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, a Pakistani national, was conv...