Search Results for "paternal uncle"

274 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 274 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Hostile Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Medical Evidence Alone Insufficient Without Victim's Testimony.

The appellant, Imran Shamim Khan, was convicted by the Special Judge under the POCSO Act, Gr. Bombay in Sessions Case No. 923 of 2013 for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Abetment to Suicide Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 and 306 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Bhagwan Chintaman Thakre, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 376, 306, 342, 323, 504 and 506 read with Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Cousin Brothers for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Family Land Dispute — Life Imprisonment Maintained for Offences Under Sections 302 and 307 IPC Read with Section 149 IPC.

The appellants, Rajendra Dada Zargad and Pandharinath Dada Zargad, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati, in Sessions Case No. 105...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 3/7/1989 passed by the Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, in Sessions Case No.39 of 198...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Withdrawal from Land Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Government's Discretion to Withdraw Upheld After Notification Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Resettlement of Project Displaced Persons Act, 1976 Lapsed.

The petitioners, Sharad Jijaba Kakade and Sandip Jijaba Kakade, were members of a joint Hindu family that owned ancestral land recorded in the name of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Appellant failed to show any substantial question of law arising from concurrent findings of courts below regarding possession and title of suit property.

The case involves a second appeal filed by Sou. Sheetal Ulhas Dangi, who was the original defendant no.22, against the judgment and decree passed by t...