Search Results for "occupancy"

616 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 616 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

A-Kharab vs B-Kharab Land Judgment: Karnataka High Court Rules No Reclassification Without Survey & Records (2026)

The dispute concerned land in Survey No.20 of Chinnappanahalli Village, which had been granted to the petitioner’s grandfather under the Mysore ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit Involving Tenancy Rights of Joint Hindu Family. Tenancy rights in suit property held not to be joint family property and not liable for partition.

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the defendant-appellant against the judgment and de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit Involving Tenancy Rights of Joint Hindu Family. Court Holds That Tenancy Rights Are Not Joint Family Property and Cannot Be Partitioned Under Hindu Law.

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the defendant against the judgment and decree of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Transfer Case Due to Violation of Section 29(3)(a) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Will Executed Without Prior Permission of Competent Authority for Class-II Occupancy Land Held Invalid.

The case involves a second appeal by the original defendant, Sakharam Shrawan Bhise, against the judgment of the lower appellate court which confirmed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Caste Certificate Cancellation Orders for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Caste Certificate Cancelled Without Notice or Hearing Under Karnataka Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Act, 2000.

The petitioner, Smt Mallamma, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orders dated 21.12.2015 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Title Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Plaintiff's title based on Hakkupatra grant upheld by both courts below; no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Smt. Sumitra Bai, was the defendant in a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction filed by the respondent-plaintiff, P. S...