Search Results for "lump sum payment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "lump sum payment"

380 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 380 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Seafarer's Compensation Case, Upholds Entitlement Under Employees' Compensation Act but Denies TCC Agreement Claim. Court holds that compensation under the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 is the statutory minimum and cannot be substituted by a contractual claim under a TCC agreement unless expressly provided.

19 Jan 2022

The appellant, Mosa Anand Rajulu, was employed as an Ordinary Seafarer with respondent No. 1, M/s. V. Ships Monaco, on board MV DT PROVIDENCE. On 30 M...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Specific Performance of Sale Agreement Despite Prior Oral Agreement - Vendor's Breach and Bona Fide Purchaser Protection. The court upheld the concurrent findings that the subsequent vendee is entitled to specific performance only of the portion not covered by a prior registered sale deed in favour of a bona fide purchaser without notice under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

18 Sep 2020

The case involves a dispute over the specific performance of an agreement for sale of land. The Vendor, B. Santoshamma, purchased 300 sq. yards of lan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Unauthorised Construction — No Right to Regularise Illegal Construction by Payment of Fees. The Court held that payment of development charges does not condone unauthorised construction under Sections 44 and 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

29 Aug 2019

The petitioner, Savitribai Phule Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, challenged a notice dated 9th March 2018 issued by the Solapur Municipal Corporation demand...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Insurance Company Service Dispute — No Work No Pay Principle Applied for Period After Punishment Order. Employee Not Entitled to Salary for Period of Unauthorised Absence Despite Subsequent Quashing of Termination Order.

1 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the Chief Regional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited against a judgment of the Allahabad High ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Insurance Company Service Dispute — No Work No Pay Principle Applied for Period After Punishment Order. Setting Aside of Termination Order Does Not Automatically Entitle Employee to Back Wages; Employee Must Show Willingness to Work.

1 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by United India Insurance Company against a High Court order directing payment of salary to the respondent, Sir...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Conflict on Compassionate Appointment Scheme to Larger Bench in State Bank of India vs. Sheo Shankar Tewari. Two lines of precedent on whether pending applications are governed by the scheme in force at the time of death or at the time of consideration require reconciliation.

8 Feb 2019

The respondent's father, an employee of the State Bank of India, died in harness on 11.11.2004. The respondent applied for compassionate appointment o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Petition and Allows Employees' Petition in Part in Lock-Out Wages Dispute Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court upheld the Labour Court's direction to pay 12 months lock-out wages to former employees who had left service, but denied the claim for 20 months ex-gratia payment as not based on any existing right.

31 Aug 2012

The judgment concerns two cross writ petitions arising from an order of the Labour Court, Mumbai, dated 27 October 2005, in an application under Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preemptive Purchase Orders Under Chapter XXC of Income Tax Act — Difference in Valuation Below 15% Threshold. The Appropriate Authority's orders under section 269UD(1) were set aside as the difference between fair market value and apparent consideration was less than 15%, and no opportunity of hearing was given.

23 Dec 2011

The petitioners, Pandharinath Bhikaji Telge and Dattaram Bhikaji Telge, were owners of a property in Chembur, Mumbai. They entered into an agreement t...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Vessel Maintenance Contract Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be in Conflict with Public Policy or Patent Illegality. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's interpretation that the respondent was not liable for pre-existing HOTO defects, as the contract did not impose such liability.

18 Oct 2010

The petitioner, Oil & Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. (ONGC), challenged an arbitral award dated 2nd April, 2008 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Revision in Rent Control Matter — Tenant's Appeal Allowed Erroneously by District Judge. Landlord's Eviction Petition Under Section 15 of Hyderabad Houses (Rent, Eviction and Lease) Control Act, 1954 Was Wrongly Set Aside by Appellate Court Without Proper Consideration of Evidence.

5 Oct 2010

The petitioner, Sureshchandra Doiphode, is the landlord of shop no.20/93, C.T.S. No.4580 at Hingoli. He filed an eviction petition under Section 15 of...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)