Search Results for "invalid detention order"

324 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 324 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention. Delay of 38 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Matheshwari, mother of the detenu Jeganraj, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Delay of Over Two Months Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Under Section 2(f) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Invalid.

The petitioner, Aburojakani, mother of the detenu Mohammed Yusuf, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Detention Order Due to Inordinate Delay Between Arrest and Detention. Delay of 37 Days Snaps Live and Proximate Link Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982, Rendering Detention Order Invalid.

The petitioner, Alminha, wife of the detenu Mohammed Masthan, filed a Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Unexplained delay of 37 days snaps the 'live and proximate link' between grounds of detention and purpose of detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Sarojini, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detention order dated 29.07.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Drug Offender Case Due to Inordinate Delay in Passing Detention Order. Unexplained Delay of 32 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link Under Section 2(e) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Sakthivel, father of the detenu Sathiyaseelan, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Orders for Non-Application of Mind. Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Relevant Material and Relied on Irrelevant Grounds, Rendering Subjective Satisfaction Invalid.

The Bombay High Court delivered a common judgment in two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking writs of habeas c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application. Failure to Disclose Compelling Reasons for Detention Despite Awareness of Custody Renders Order Invalid Under Section 3(1) of MPDA Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Pravin @ Purshottam Shrinivas Mahajan, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 29 April 2014 passed by the Commissioner of P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Failure to furnish statements of witnesses, bail applications, and other material relied upon by detaining authority violates Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Amin Mehboob Shaikh, challenged a detention order dated 27 July 2011 issued by the District Magistrate, Pune under Section 3(1) of the...