Search Results for "inconsistent testimony"

1718 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1718 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault of Minor Set Aside as Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Other Witnesses.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under POCSO Act and IPC for alleged aggravated penetrative sexual assault of a 6-year-old girl. The vic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's evidence was found untrustworthy and the recovery of weapon was not sufficiently corroborated.

The appellant, Hira Lohar, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Bishnath Mehar. The prosecution case relied heavily on the sole testi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 323, 498A, 307 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Sri T.V. Manjunatha against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 04.10.2016 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Evidence Lacked Corroboration and Was Contradictory.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction filed by the appellants under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 506 IPC set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Mohan Digambar Lokhande, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Yavatmal in Special (POCSO) Case 9 of 2018 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shamlal s/o Punaram Achale, was convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara in Sessions Trial 139/2001 for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 307/34 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Sections 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellants, Dipak s/o Ramaji K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Education Officer in Bribery Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Contradictory Evidence. Conviction under Section 161 IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Harishchandra Prabhakar Borkar, was the Education Officer of Zilla Parishad, Nagpur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Janardhan Ramaji @ Ramrao Bannagare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Sessions Case No. 116/2011 for the murde...