High Court of Karnataka Examines Government Order on Mahabaleshwara Temple Administration. Dispute Pertains to Control and Management of Temple as per Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950.
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "implied compliance"
801 result(s) found
Found 801 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a force majeure event under Clause 14 of the FOSFA 20 Contract, and enforcement of the award is not against public policy despite procedural irregularities.
22 Apr 2020The case involves a dispute between National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a canalizing agency for the Government of...
- 212
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Lack of Notice Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Co-owners Not Served Individual Notice Before Acquisition for Irrigation Project, Violating Section 4(1) and Section 9(3) of the 1894 Act.
2 Jan 2024The case involves a writ petition filed by three co-owners of agricultural land in Village Nere, Taluka Maval, District Pune, challenging the acquisit...
- 40
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...
- 61
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Challenging Tender and Work Orders in Cooperative Milk Marketing. Petitions Filed by Warehousing Agent and Co-Packer Against Karnataka Cooperative Milk Federation and Its Unions Alleging Breach of Exclusive Contracts for Telangana Operations.
1 Jun 2026Background: The case involved two writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging certain actions of the Karnataka Co-operative Mi...
- 44
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Scope of Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act in International Commercial Disputes. Multiple Issues Framed on Reference to Arbitration in Multi-Party Joint Venture Agreements.
1 Aug 2026The dispute arose from a series of joint venture and ancillary agreements executed between Indian company Chloro Controls (I) P. Ltd. and foreign coll...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of Temporary Employees by Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai — Violation of Natural Justice and Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Termination of temporary employees without notice or hearing is illegal; reinstatement with 50% back wages granted.
8 Dec 2021The petitioners, Bharti Santosh Bhosale and others, were temporary employees of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. Their services were termi...
- 52
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Appeal on Applicability of Section 9 of Arbitration Act to Foreign-Seated Arbitration. The Appeal Concerns Interim Measures in a Contract Governed by English Law with Arbitration in London.
1 Jan 1970The dispute arose out of an agreement dated 20.10.2010 between Harmony Innovation Shipping Ltd. (appellant) and Gupta Coal India Ltd. (first responden...
- 63
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Abolition of Odisha Administrative Tribunal — Power to Abolish SATs Upheld Under General Clauses Act and Article 323-A. The Court held that the Union Government has the power to abolish a State Administrative Tribunal established under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, and the notification dated 2 August 2019 is valid.
21 Mar 2023The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against the Orissa High Court judgment upholding the abolition of the Odisha Administrative Tribunal (OAT). The ...
- 194
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Suspension Order in Service Matter Due to Non-Compliance with Review Requirement Under Rule 4(5)(a) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979. Suspension Invalid as Not Reviewed Within 90 Days, Petitioner Entitled to Reinstatement with Consequential Benefits.
22 Dec 2017The petitioner, Hiralal Rama Jadhav, was serving as Superintendent of Prison at Thane Central Jail since 15/02/2016. On 29/08/2016, a lady constable s...
- 77
