Search Results for "fraud/misrepresentation"

939 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 939 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court heard challenge to deemed conveyance order under MOFA; developer alleged res judicata due to consent decree. Developer contended that Competent Authority lacked jurisdiction under Section 11(3) when consent decree already provided for conveyance.

The writ petition was filed by developers challenging an order of deemed conveyance passed by the Competent Authority under Section 11(3) of the Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Chamber Summons Filed by Defendant for Return of Plaint in Suit for Damages Under Lease Agreement. Application Seeks Transfer to Chennai Court Citing Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause; Court Also Considers Limitation and Cause of Action.

The matter pertained to a chamber summons filed by the defendant in a suit for damages. The defendant, Integrated Finance Co. Ltd., sought return of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Against LIC — Tenant Association Fails to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Agreement to Sell Not Concluded as Essential Terms Remained Unsettled and No Binding Contract Was Formed Under Section 10 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appeal arose from a decree of the City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai dismissing S.C. Suit No. 8228 of 1984, which was a suit for specific performanc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Recovery from Gratuity of Retired Class III and IV Employees. Recovery of excess payment made due to wrong pay fixation without fault of employee is impermissible after retirement.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by retired Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) employed with Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The petitioners, J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Will Dispute Case — High Court Erred in Interfering with Concurrent Findings of Fact. Will Execution Proved Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 65(c) of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The case involves a dispute over the validity of a Will dated 30.04.1980 executed by Chandu Ram in favor of his grandsons (sons of defendant No.5 Soha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Broadcast Rights Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 4.77 Crore with Interest. Arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages were not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, Maharashtra Film Stage and Cultural Development Corporation Ltd., a Government of Maharashtra corporation, challenged an Arbitral Awar...