Search Results for "employees provident fund"

585 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 585 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes EPF Orders Passed Without Proper Inquiry in Textile Processing Unit Case. Orders under Sections 7A and 7B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice and lack of evidence.

The petitioner, M/s Dadu Processors (P) Ltd., a textile processing unit, challenged orders dated 29.12.2022 passed under Section 7A and 06.04.2023 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Municipal Council's Challenge to EPF Liability Determination. Review Application Under Section 7-B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Rejected as No Error Apparent on Record and Delay Not Explained.

The petitioner, Municipal Council, Dhamangaon, a civic body established in 1945 and governed by the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Former OCS Employees Seeking Government Pension After Absorption in VSNL. Eligibility for Pension Under Office Memorandum Requires Minimum 10 Years of Qualifying Service on Date of Absorption.

The present Civil Appeal arose out of a challenge to the Judgment and Order dated January 13, 2016 passed by the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes PF Orders for Violation of Natural Justice in M/s Ashmit Motors Case. Orders under Sections 7A and 7B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 set aside as passed without hearing the establishment.

The petitioner, M/s Ashmit Motors Private Limited, a car dealership, challenged two orders passed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner: (1) an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits by Counting Prior Service with Board Under Rule 46(2) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 — Resignation to Take Up Another Appointment with Permission Does Not Forfeit Past Service

The Petitioner, Smt. Nagaveni R., filed a writ petition seeking pension and other retiral benefits by counting her service from 25.2.1975 to 5.11.1984...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging EPF Appellate Tribunal Order for Lack of Merit. Petitioner failed to demonstrate any perversity or error in the Tribunal's decision confirming damages under Sections 7A and 14B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

The petitioner, M/s Shiv Herbal Research Laboratory Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging EPF Appellate Tribunal Order for Lack of Merit. Petitioner failed to appear before Tribunal despite adjournment, and no substantial question of law arose.

The petitioner, M/s. Yadgar Gold Fingers, a proprietorship concern, challenged an order dated 18/10/2010 passed by the Employees' Provident Fund Appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Regularisation of Part-Time Professor's Service — No Right to Regularisation Without Sanctioned Post and Recruitment Process. Part-Time Appointment Does Not Confer Right to Regularisation in Absence of Sanctioned Post Under Relevant Recruitment Rules.

The petitioner, Ramkrishna Sadashiv Jadhav, was appointed as a part-time professor at Siddhartha College of Arts, Science and Commerce, Mumbai. He fil...