High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Petitioner in Co-operative Election Writ Petition. No specific legal finding available as the judgment text is incomplete.
2 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "electronic filing"
578 result(s) found
Found 578 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Delay Condonation in Mutation Entry Challenge. Court holds that delay in challenging mutation entry cannot be attributed to petitioner when authorities failed to comply with statutory duty under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.
2 Mar 2023The petitioners, Shankarrao Premaji Banarase and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur challenging the order dated 30/0...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Late Filing of Written Statement in Commercial Suit — Service of Writ of Summons Not Mandatory When Defendant Has Entered Appearance and Received Plaint and Notice of Motion. The court held that the object of service of summons is to give notice, and if the defendant has already appeared and received the plaint, formal service is not required under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC and Section 16 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
21 Dec 2022The Petitioner, Metro Ortem Ltd, a public limited company, filed a Commercial Suit No. 3 of 2019 before the Bombay City Civil Court at Mumbai against ...
- 22
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeal in Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act Case — Continuing Unlawful Activity Requires Post-Promulgation Offence. The Court held that the prosecution must prove that the accused committed an organised crime after the Act came into force, and mere prior charge-sheets are insufficient to invoke the Act.
15 Dec 2022The State of Gujarat appealed against the High Court's order granting bail to the respondent-accused, Sandip Omprakash Gupta, who was charged under Se...
- 213
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Bail Order in Companies Act Case, Clarifying Statutory Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC. The Court held that filing of complaint before expiry of prescribed period extinguishes right to statutory bail, regardless of cognizance being taken, under Section 167(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
7 Feb 2022The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) against a bail order dated 31.05.2019 passed by the High Court of P...
- 436
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Wife's Appeal Against Divorce Decree on Ground of Cruelty Under Section 13(1)(i) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Marriage Dissolved as Wife's Conduct of Filing False Complaints and Making Unfounded Allegations Constituted Mental Cruelty.
25 Oct 2019The appellant-wife, Smt. K. C. Saritha, filed an appeal under Section 19(4)(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, challenging the judgment and decree dat...
- 28
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision of GST TRAN-1 Form for Cenvat Credit Carry Forward Due to Inadvertent Error. The court permitted the petitioner to correct an inadvertent transfer of credit to a branch in Hyderabad, directing the respondents to allow filing of a revised TRAN-1 under Section 140(8) of the CGST Act, 2017.
28 Mar 2019The petitioner, M/s Atria Convergence Technologies Ltd, a public limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and the Central Goods and Se...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to NMMC's Property Tax Levy on MIDC Industrial Area. TTC Area Held to Be Within Municipal Limits Under 1991 Notification; No Direction to Constitute Industrial Township.
8 Jul 2010The petitioners, including Small Scale Entrepreneurs Association and Mahape Industries Welfare Association, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of...
- 66
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 for Debt Disputed in Good Faith. Petition Filed to Exert Pressure for Unreasonable Demands, Not for Recovery of Genuine Debt.
7 Jun 2006The petitioner, Fomento Resorts And Hotels Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 against the respondent, G...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 138 NI Act and Directs Magistrates to Accept Complaints Without Preliminary Inquiry. Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is constitutionally valid and Section 200 CrPC does not require preliminary inquiry in cheque dishonour cases.
30 Nov -0001The judgment arises from a batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and the p...
- 150
