Search Results for "dissolved firm"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "dissolved firm"

248 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 248 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Wife's Appeal Against Divorce Decree on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion Under Hindu Marriage Act. Wife's Constant Taunting and Unjustified Departure from Matrimonial Home Constituted Mental Cruelty and Wilful Desertion Under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

26 Apr 2016

The appellant-wife challenged the judgment and decree dated 4.9.2014 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Mandya, in M.C. No.26/2009, which dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals as Not Maintainable: Order on Territorial Jurisdiction Not Appealable Under Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act. The Court Holds That Orders Under Section 9-A CPC Are Not Enumerated in Order XLIII CPC or Section 37 Arbitration Act, Limiting Appeals in Commercial Disputes.

14 Sep 2017

The dispute arose out of two commercial suits filed before the Bombay High Court, where the plaintiffs claimed reliefs and the defendants raised preli...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Arguments on Constitutional Validity of Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1984 — Matter Remains Undecided in Provided Text. Petitioner Contended Act Lacked Nexus with Directive Principles and Was Not Protected Under Article 31C.

26 Feb 2014

The petitioners, M/s Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works, a partnership firm, challenged the constitutional validity of the Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works (Acq...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Shareholders' EGM Requisition in Zee Entertainment Dispute — Upholds Right to Convene Meeting Under Section 100 of Companies Act, 2013. Court holds that shareholders holding 17.88% stake have statutory right to requisition EGM for removal of directors and that the company cannot restrain such meeting on grounds of alleged illegalities in proposed resolutions.

22 Mar 2022

The case involves an appeal by Invesco Developing Markets Fund and OFI Global China Fund LLC (collectively holding 17.88% of shares in Zee Entertainme...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Recall Order in Execution Proceedings. Judgment Debtor's Application Under Section 151 CPC for Recalling Order Dated 10.07.2024 Was Rightly Dismissed as Not Maintainable.

8 Jul 2025

The petitioner, M/s Pushpam Realty, a partnership firm, is the judgment debtor in Execution No.1075/2020 pending before the III Additional City Civil ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Violation of Section 15 Hindu Marriage Act — No Willful Disobedience of Court Process. Section 15 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 does not create a legal bar or incapacity to remarry pending appeal; it only imposes a procedural restriction, and its violation does not constitute civil contempt under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

8 Sep 2020

The contempt petition was filed by Kanchan Bagade against her husband Prashant Bagade alleging willful disobedience of 'other process of a court' unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Appellate Court's Dismissal of Suit. Court holds that plaintiff failed to prove agreement and readiness and willingness, and suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

3 Jan 2024

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of immovable property. The plaintiff, Manoj Manilal Gala (appellant), ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retrospective Penalty Under Section 69A of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 for Non-Intimation of Alterations. The court upheld the validity of the Maharashtra Amendment Act 29 of 1984 imposing retrospective penalty for failure to intimate changes in partnership deeds.

26 Sep 2006

The petitioners, M/s. Adamji Lookmanji & Co. and others, filed a writ petition challenging orders dated 25th April, 2005 and 12th October, 2004 passed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Notices Against Directors in Central Excise Case — No Personal Liability Without Specific Statutory Provision. Directors of a company cannot be treated as assessees or deemed to be in default for excise duty demands under the Central Excise Act, 1944, in the absence of a provision akin to Section 179 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

17 Aug 2005

The petitioners, Sunil Parmeshwar Mittal and Kirti Trambaklal Shah, were directors of a company that was assessed for excise duty. The Deputy Commissi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reinstates Prosecution of Public Servant and Spouse in Prevention of Corruption Act Case for Disproportionate Assets. High Court's Discharge Order Quashed as It Erred in Re-appreciating Evidence at Charge Framing Stage Under Section 239 CrPC, Failing to Consider Prima Facie Case Based on FIR and Charge Sheet Materials.

5 Sep 2022

The Supreme Court heard appeals by the State of Tamil Nadu against the Madras High Court's judgment discharging a public servant and his wife from pro...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)