Search Results for "detention order quashed"

1115 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1115 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Procedural Lapses Petitioner Challenges Preventive Detention Based on Arms Act Offences and In-camera Statements -- Court Finds Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Violation of Article 22 Safeguards

The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition challenging a detention order under the MPDA Act, which directed his detention for 12 months on grounds ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Reproduction of Grounds. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Violated as Relevant Documents Not Supplied.

The petitioner, Jitendra @ Tiger Umaji Pawar, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Boot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Activist in UAPA Case for Failure to File Charge Sheet Within 90 Days. The court held that the right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC is indefeasible and the period of house arrest cannot be excluded from the computation of the 90-day period.

The appellant, Gautam P. Navlakha, a 69-year-old scholar, writer, and civil rights activist, was arrested on 28/10/2018 in connection with FIR No. 4 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under PASA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Procedural Lapses. Detenu's Preventive Detention Set Aside as Subjective Satisfaction Was Not Properly Recorded and Grounds of Detention Were Not Communicated in Time.

The petitioner, Nitin Bhimabhai Patel, was detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 (PASA Act) by orders dated 14/03/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Relevant Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 2nd April 2009 passed by respondent no.2 under Section 3(1) of the Conserv...