Search Results for "dangerous activities"

759 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 759 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detenue's alleged anti-social activities did not meet the threshold of 'dangerous person' under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985.

The petitioner, Manisha D/o Patantaru @ Patantaal Naidu, was preventively detained by the Police Commissioner, Surat, vide order dated 18/01/2026, und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Proximity Between Offences and Public Order. Single Criminal Case and In-Camera Statements Held Insufficient to Establish Threat to Public Order Under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Salman @ Baba Harun Khan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 18.01.2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Council of Architecture's Appeal, Upholds That Section 37 of Architects Act Only Prohibits Use of Title 'Architect'. Government Posts Titled 'Architect' Can Be Held by Unregistered Individuals as the Act Does Not Prohibit Practice of Architecture.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Allahabad High Court's judgment that Section 37 of the Architects Act, 1972 only prohibits unregister...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Inordinate Delay — Preventive Detention Invalidated as Live Link Between Grounds and Detention Purpose Broken

The petitioner, mother of the detenu Zainul Abbas Shabbir Rajan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Confirmation by Advisory Board. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Violated as Grounds of Detention Were Not Properly Considered.

The petitioner, Shrinivas Kishor Sanga, challenged his detention order dated 30/10/2018 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Measures. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Did Not Consider Whether Bail Conditions Could Adequately Prevent Petitioner's Dangerous Activities.

The petitioner, Deepak Suryawanshi, challenged a preventive detention order dated 11 July 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Secti...