Search Results for "closing date"

934 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 934 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Police Notices Restricting Hotel Timings — Government Notification Under Shops Act Cannot Override Police Act Restrictions on Eating Houses.

The petitioners, Yogesh Panditrao Khaire and others, are running a hotel named 'Hotel Saheba' in Nashik. They obtained a licence under the Bombay Shop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award of damages for breach of contract, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Sonoma Management Partners Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Claimant's claim for refund of margin money and compensation for unauthorized trades upheld as arbitrator's findings of fact are final under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Inventory Proceedings for Desertion Under Portuguese Civil Procedure Code. The court held that desertion of instance requires a duty to proceed and inertia, which was absent as the appellant had no obligation to take steps after remand.

The case involves an appeal against an order of the Comarca Judge of Salcete and Quepem at Margao dismissing an application and closing Inventory Proc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Upholds Family Court Order Allowing Reopening of Evidence in Nullity of Marriage Petition — Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC Permits Recall/Re-examination at Any Stage Before Judgment to Prevent Failure of Justice.

The petitioner-husband filed a petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking a decree of nullity of marriage against the ...