WRIT PETITION NO. 15903 OF 2024
6 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "central electricity regulatory commission"
174 result(s) found
Found 174 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Act Matter — One Time Settlement Not Binding as Bank Did Not Accept Offer. Court Held That Mere Submission of OTS Proposal Does Not Create Binding Contract; Bank's Rejection Valid.
8 Jul 2024The petitioners, borrowers of the respondent bank, challenged the order dated 22.09.2022 passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Bangalore in Diary No...
- 132
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging KSRTC E-Tender Notification for Commercial Complexes at Hassan Bus Stand. Petitioner's claim of being an ongoing contractor and representations not considered as the tender process had already concluded.
4 Oct 2023The petitioner, H.N. Pruthivinarayan, claiming to be an ongoing contractor, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...
- 101
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Bridge Construction Dispute — No Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Perverse or Contrary to Public Policy. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contract clauses regarding fixed and variable costs, finding no patent illegality or perversity.
23 Sep 2022The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against a Single Judge's order dismissing a Section 34 pet...
- 48
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Liquidator's Appeal on Limitation Grounds in Insolvency Proceeding. Limitation period under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 runs from the date the order is made available, not from pronouncement, applying Section 420(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 50 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 for free copies.
22 Oct 2021The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 13 July 2020, which dismissed the appellant's appeal as ...
- 362
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Quash Order Refusing FIR Registration in Environmental Violation Case — Section 19 of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 Bars Private Complaints Without Government Sanction. The court held that Section 19 does not bar police from registering an FIR, but the applicant's complaint lacked specific allegations of violation of the Act or rules.
22 Oct 2019The applicant, Pratap Lal Teli, filed a Criminal Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash an order pass...
- 118
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs Expert Appraisal Committee to Revisit Environmental Clearance for Greenfield Airport at Mopa, Goa, Balancing Development and Biodiversity Concerns in Western Ghats. The Court suspends the environmental clearance pending fresh appraisal by the EAC, emphasizing the need to preserve forests, ecologically sensitive areas, and water channels.
23 Apr 2019The Supreme Court of India was hearing a Miscellaneous Application filed by the Union of India, Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (M...
- 236
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Regularisation of Encroachment on Communidade Land in Public Interest Litigation. Administrative Tribunal's Order Regularising Unauthorised Construction by Minister Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Communidade Land Protection Laws.
25 Feb 2014The petitioner, an advocate and public spirited citizen, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the order of the Administrative Tribunal (resp...
- 100
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Dispute Between Bhartiya Samruddhi Finance Ltd. and State of Maharashtra. Court holds that disputes arising from a contract containing an arbitration clause are arbitrable and appoints arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, Bhartiya Samruddhi Finance Ltd., filed an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking...
- 26
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Suo Motu Reference on Summoning Advocates During Investigation; Examines Scope of Advocate-Client Privilege and Need for Guidelines to Prevent Coercive Summons. Court Addresses Legality of Direct Summons to Lawyers Under Section 179 BNSS and Absence of Judicial Oversight.
1 Jan 1970The Supreme Court initiated suo motu proceedings following a reference from a two-judge bench in a Special Leave Petition challenging a notice issued ...
- 23
