Search Results for "army rules"

233 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 233 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows BEST's Petition Against Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practices — Increments and Leave Benefits for Daily Wagers Upheld Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BEST), challenged a judgment and order dated 17th October 2019 passed by the Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order of BSF Inspector Due to Non-Compliance with Transfer Policy and Lack of Consideration of Representation. Transfer Order Set Aside as Authority Failed to Consider Employee's Representation, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, P.S. Venkatesh, an Inspector in the Border Security Force (BSF) with over 36 years of service, challenged a movement order dated 08.02...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Airman in Theft Case, Sets Aside Tribunal Order. Air Force Act is a Special Law; Registration of FIR Not Mandatory for Court Martial Proceedings.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Union of India against the order of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Lucknow, which had se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Promotion Policy for Air Vice Marshal Based on Seniority-cum-Merit. Air Commodore's Challenge Dismissed as Policy Valid and No Right to Promotion.

The appellant, Air Commodore Naveen Jain, was commissioned in the Indian Air Force in 1981 and promoted to Air Commodore in 2011. He was considered fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Rule 9(1) of Karnataka Civil Services (General Recruitment) Rules, 1977 Providing Reservation for Ex-Servicemen and Physically Handicapped. Rule 9(1) Held Valid and Not Violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Pankaj Premanand Nagekar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Retired Teacher Seeking Pension Benefits in Kendriya Vidyalaya Pension Case Due to Cut-off Date. Cut-off Date of 1st January, 1986 for Pension Eligibility Upheld as Reasonable Classification Under Article 14.

The petitioner, Sindhu Vishwanath Phadake, joined service as a teacher in Adarsh Vidya Bhavan School on 1st November, 1957 and worked until 24th June,...