Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

1376 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1376 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds High Court Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 29A(4) of Arbitration Act for Extension of Time. The term 'Court' in Section 29A(4) is interpreted to mean the High Court, not the Civil Court, to ensure uniformity and avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

The case arose from a dispute between Jagdeep Chowgule (appellant) and Sheela Chowgule & Ors. (respondents) concerning the jurisdiction to entertain a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Grounds for Interference Established. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings Were Based on Evidence and Not Perverse, and the Petition Was Barred by Limitation.

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside an arbitral ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay High Court Condonation of Delay in Filing Arbitration Challenge" "Justice Arif S. Doctor condones a 14-day delay in filing under Section 34, interpreting procedural requirements for signed arbitral awards in light of mandatory statute compliance."

1. Introduction and Parties The case involves the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) as the petitioner and Mumbai Metro One Pvt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Filing Arbitration Application Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Dispute Centers on Whether Limitation Runs from Original Award or Belated Correction Order When Section 33 Application Filed Beyond 30 Days.

The writ petitions challenged the order of the Commercial Court condoning the delay in filing arbitration suits under Section 34 of the Arbitration an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Awards for Lack of Concluded Contract. Joint Exploration Agreement Held Not Binding as Conditions Precedent Not Fulfilled, Resulting in No Valid Arbitration Agreement.

The case involves appeals by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Prize Petroleum Company Ltd. (appellants) against M3nergy Sdn. Bhd. (respondent)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interlocutory Order as Not Maintainable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Order Rejecting Permission to File Fresh Valuation Report Is Not an Interim Award and Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 34.

The dispute arises from a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated 22.12.2003 between Dilip Timblo (appellant) and Prashant Timblo (respondent). The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Agency Dispute — Award Declared Enforceable as Decree. Foreign Award Under Sections 46-49 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Upheld as No Grounds for Refusal Under Section 48 Established.

The petitioner, Mitsui OSK Lines Ltd., a Japanese shipping company, filed a petition under Sections 46 to 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...