Search Results for "advance refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "advance refund"

606 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 606 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case, Holding That Acceptance of Delayed Possession Without Protest Does Not Waive Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA. Statutory Right to Interest Under RERA Cannot Be Waived by Mere Acceptance of Possession Without a Clear Agreement.

18 Jun 2026

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Rejects Trial Court's Dismissal of Temporary Injunction. Agreement of Sale for Rs.10.75 Crore with Rs.5 Crore Advance — Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience in Favor of Plaintiff-Appellant.

23 Nov 2024

The appellant, M/s. Sanjeevini Developers and others, filed a miscellaneous first appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Builder in Consumer Dispute Over Double Allotment and Forfeiture. Purchase of Flat for Director's Personal Use Held Not Commercial, Affirming Consumer Status Under Section 2(7) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

9 Sep 2024

The respondent, Kushalraj Land Developers Pvt. Ltd., a real estate company, booked a flat in the appellant's project 'Omkar 1973 Worli' for the reside...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes DRT/DRAT Orders Allowing Sale of Mortgaged Property Below Reserve Price — Unsecured Creditor Cannot Be Treated as Secured Creditor with Priority Over Mortgagee. The court held that treating an unsecured creditor as a secured creditor with priority over the mortgagee is a fundamental fallacy, and directed a fresh auction in accordance with law.

18 Mar 2024

The writ petition was filed by Assets Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. (ARCIL), the beneficiary of a mortgage over Flat No. 61, Basant Apartment, M...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition to Restrain Encashment of Bank Guarantee in Contract Dispute — No Concluded Contract Found. Court quashes demand letters and directs status quo, holding that without a work order, there is no concluded contract and invocation is arbitrary.

2 Jun 2023

The petitioner, PG Setty Construction Technology Pvt. Ltd., a construction company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constituti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Pensionary Benefits Case — Advance Increment Recovery Set Aside. Recovery of Rs.67,918/- from pensionary benefits of a retired Lower Division Clerk quashed as recovery from a Class III employee after superannuation is impermissible under State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

1 Dec 2022

The petitioner, Manohar Bappaji Gaikwad, was a Lower Division Clerk working with the Civil Court at Kallam, District Osmanabad. On 21.11.2006, he rece...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in MRTP Act Case Upholding Commission's Finding of No Unfair Trade Practices. The Court Held That Extra Charges and Cancellation of Apartment Allotment Were Contractual and Did Not Constitute Unfair Trade Practices Under Sections 36-A and 36-B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969.

25 Jan 2022

The appeal arose from a judgment dated 19.01.2009 by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, New Delhi, which dismissed a complaint...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restores Conviction of Accused in Dishonour of Cheque Case Under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The High Court Erred in Setting Aside Concurrent Conviction by Questioning Payment of Consideration Despite Admitted Signatures and Statutory Presumptions Under Sections 118 and 139 of the Act.

23 Sep 2021

The dispute originated from a transaction where the respondent agreed to sell a house to the appellant for Rs. 4,00,000, with an advance of Rs. 3,50,0...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Wagon Supply Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that appellant failed to prove force majeure and that respondent was entitled to refund of advance payment with interest.

10 Apr 2018

The appellant, Titagarh Wagons Limited, entered into a purchase order dated 20.02.2006 with the respondent, Chowgule and Company Private Limited, for ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Sale Agreement — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. The court held that the plaintiff did not adduce evidence to show continuous readiness and willingness to perform the contract, and the suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

24 Mar 2015

The appellant, V.P. Venkatesh, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure,...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)